Can someone explain to me what my professor did?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Warlic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Professor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of the equations for a damped harmonic oscillator. The participant clarifies that the expression for omega is correct, derived from the system's parameters. The confusion arises around the form of the solution x(t), with an emphasis on the need for a damping term, leading to the correct expression x(t) = e^(-bt/2m)(c1*cos(ωt) + c2*sin(ωt)). It is noted that the sine and cosine components can be combined into a single cosine function with a phase shift. The conversation concludes with the acknowledgment that both forms of the solution are equivalent, each involving two constants of integration.
Warlic
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-11-6_17-35-30.png
[/B]

Two things I don't understand; how did he get that omega is sqrt(k/m-(b/2m)^2)
And second; why is it that x(t) = e^(-bt/2m)* cos (omega*t+phi)
shouldnt it rather be; x(t) = c1*cos(ωt) + c2*sin(ωt)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured out why omega is what it is, but still don't understand how he got the equation for x(t)
 
I think he's assuming that the system is underdamped, so will be a damped sinusoid. The general solution can be molded into that shape:

##x(t) = c_1 cos(ωt) + c_2 sin(ωt)##
##~~~= \sqrt{c_1^2 + c_2^2}\left( \frac{c_1}{\sqrt{c_1^2 + c_2^2}} cos(ωt) + \frac{c_2}{\sqrt{c_1^2 + c_2^2}} sin(ωt) \right) ##
##~~~= \sqrt{c_1^2 + c_2^2}\left(cos(\phi) cos(ωt) + sin(\phi) sin(ωt) \right) ##
##~~~= \sqrt{c_1^2 + c_2^2} cos(ωt - \phi)## where: ##~~~~\phi = tan^{-1}\left( \frac{c_2}{c_1} \right)##

You can fudge the sign of the angle ##\phi## by negating it and interpreting it appropriately.
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
Aren't c1 and c2 constants? If so, I see a sinusoid, not a damped sinusoid.
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
Mister T said:
Aren't c1 and c2 constants? If so, I see a sinusoid, not a damped sinusoid.
Ah, right. I left out the damping term in the general solution o:) So:
##x(t) = e^{-\alpha t}(c_1 cos(ωt) + c_2 sin(ωt))##
Go from there. The roots of the auxiliary equation will be complex conjugates of the form ##\alpha ± \omega##, where ##\omega## can be further broken down as ##\omega = \sqrt{\alpha^2 - \omega_o^2}##
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
gneill said:
Ah, right. I left out the damping term in the general solution o:) So:
##x(t) = e^{-\alpha t}(c_1 cos(ωt) + c_2 sin(ωt))##
Go from there. The roots of the auxiliary equation will be complex conjugates of the form ##\alpha ± \omega##, where ##\omega## can be further broken down as ##\omega = \sqrt{\alpha^2 - \omega_o^2}##
This is exactly the point where I don't know where to go from :P. Where does the c2sin(ωt) part go?
 
Warlic said:
This is exactly the point where I don't know where to go from :P. Where does the c2sin(ωt) part go?
See post #3. The sin and cos terms can be amalgamated into a single cos (or sin) term with a constant phase shift.
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
Look at the undamped case:

##x(t)=c_1 \cos (\omega t)+c_2 \sin (\omega t)##

and

##x(t)=A \cos (\omega t+ \phi)##

are equivalent. Note that each contains two constants of integration.
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
Back
Top