Can someone please tell me how my book did this integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rijad Hadzic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Integration
Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


Attached is a picture..

the book went from
(-1 + \frac {2}{1+u} ) du + \frac {dx}{x} = 0
Edited by moderator.

to

-u + 2ln(1+u) + ln(x) = ln(c)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



How in the world could the integral of 0 be ln(c)?

Maybe because it's 5 am and I'm up late and I'm hallucinating, but I always thought the integral of 0 is c, just a constant.

taking the integral of

(-1 \frac {2}{1+u} ) du + \frac {dx}{x} = 0

I get

(-u + 2 ln(u+1) + c ) + ln(x) + c_2 = c_3

-u +2ln(u+1) + ln(x) = c_4
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    39.6 KB · Views: 494
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rijad Hadzic said:
How in the world could the integral of 0 be ln(c)?
It is an integration constant ...

Edit: And you seem to be getting exactly the same so I do not see what the problem is ...

Edit 2: Obviously, the logarithm of a constant is a constant ...
 
Orodruin said:
It is an integration constant ...

Edit: And you seem to be getting exactly the same so I do not see what the problem is ...

Edit 2: Obviously, the logarithm of a constant is a constant ...

I understand that but why not just write K or whatever, why include ln? Like where did ln come from? They later use properties of logarithms to write

\frac yx = ln(\frac {(x+y)^2}{cx}) so I need to know where the ln(c) came from..
 
I mean I guess it makes sense since ln(c) is just a constant... I guess I've just never seen anything like this before so its new to me..
 
You can use either ##c## or ##\ln(c)##, it makes absolutely no difference - both are arbitrary constants. The reason they chose ##\ln(c)## is that they could take it inside the logarithm when simplifying their expression. Again, the expressions are completely equivalent.
 
Orodruin said:
You can use either ##c## or ##\ln(c)##, it makes absolutely no difference - both are arbitrary constants. The reason they chose ##\ln(c)## is that they could take it inside the logarithm when simplifying their expression. Again, the expressions are completely equivalent.

Gotcha. I mean it makes sense now that I think about it... thank you brother.
 
Rijad Hadzic said:

Homework Statement


Attached is a picture..

the book went from
(-1 \frac {2}{1+u} ) du + \frac {dx}{x} = 0

to

-u + 2ln(1+u) + ln(x) = ln(c)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



How in the world could the integral of 0 be ln(c)?

Maybe because it's 5 am and I'm up late and I'm hallucinating, but I always thought the integral of 0 is c, just a constant.

taking the integral of

(-1 \frac {2}{1+u} ) du + \frac {dx}{x} = 0

I get

(-u + 2 ln(u+1) + c ) + ln(x) + c_2 = c_3

-u +2ln(u+1) + ln(x) = c_4

The integral of
$$\left(-1 \frac{2}{1+u} \right) du + \frac{1}{dx} = 0$$
is
$$ - 2 \ln(1+u) + \ln(x) = \text{constant}$$
How did you get ##-u + 2 \ln(1+u)?##
 
Ray Vickson said:
The integral of
$$\left(-1 \frac{2}{1+u} \right) du + \frac{1}{dx} = 0$$
is
$$ - 2 \ln(1+u) + \ln(x) = \text{constant}$$
How did you get ##-u + 2 \ln(1+u)?##
If you look at the image, he just copied it wrong. The expression is not
$$\left(-1 \frac{2}{1+u} \right) du + \frac{1}{dx} = 0$$
it is
$$\left(-1 + \frac{2}{1+u} \right) du + \frac{1}{dx} = 0$$
 
It's fixed now in post #1.
 
Back
Top