Can someone prove the uncertainty principle for me

Maurice7510
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
My qm textbook, aptly named "quantum mechanics", is by McIntyre, though it omits the proof for the uncertainty principle and simply states it as ∆A∆B ≥ 1/2|〈[A,B]〉|. In words, if that's unclear, this is 'the product of the rms deviations of A and B is greater than/equal to one half the absolute value of the mean of the commutator of A and B. It says to look elsewhere for the proof, and normally I wouldn't be bothered, but since this leads to Heisenberg's highly unintuitive result, ∆x∆p ≥ h/4π, i feel like a proof is very necessary. If anyone could prove this for me, I'd be very greatful
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a consequence of the commutation relations. Ballentine covers it in section 8.4.
 
who's ballentine?
 
Ballentine is the author of a quite popular book on quantum mechanics. As all the people writing books on quantum mechanics tend to call their books, "quantum mechanics", too, it has become quite usual to just name the author instead of the title of the book as "the book Quantum Mechanics covers it in section 8.4." would not really be a helpful information.

In this case, the exact name of the book is "Quantum Mechanics -- A Modern Development".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top