Can someone solve this equation for a?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Icebreaker
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation b²a + 2bc² = (a³b²/c²) + 2ba² + c²a, the goal is to find the value of 'a' such that P(a) = 0, where P(x) is defined as (b/c)²x³ + (2b)x² + (c² - b²)x - 2bc². Factoring the cubic polynomial P will yield a form of P(x) = (x - a)(dx² + ex + f), allowing for the identification of the desired value of 'a'. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how to factor cubic equations to find the roots. Ultimately, the solution hinges on successfully factoring the cubic polynomial.
Icebreaker
Can someone solve this equation for a?

b^2a+2bc^2=\frac{a^3b^2}{c^2}+2ba^2+c^2a
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
P(x) = (b/c)²x³ + (2b)x² + (c² - b²)x + (-2bc²)

We want to find a such that P(a) = 0

Factor this cubic P, and you'll get something in the form P(x) = (x - a)(dx² + ex + f)

That a is precisely the one you're looking for. How to factor cubics.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top