Can something moving linearly without rotation have anguar momentum?

AI Thread Summary
A point mass can possess angular momentum even when moving linearly without rotation, as angular momentum is defined relative to a reference point. In the discussed scenario, the sticky putty thrown at a stationary wheel contributes angular momentum despite its straight-line motion. This is due to the distance from the reference point, which is factored into the angular momentum calculation. The conservation of angular momentum applies here, as the system's total angular momentum remains constant when no external torque is present. Thus, the putty's linear motion still results in angular momentum relative to the wheel's position.
nabeel17
Messages
57
Reaction score
1
I was doing a question in Taylor book (example 3.3) where a sticky putty is thrown at a stationary wheel. To solve it we use conservation of angular momentum. What I am confused about is that the wheel is initially at rest and has no angular momentum initially. But when the putty is thrown at it the wheel starts spinning and gains angular momentum. Since angular momentum must be conserved (external torque is 0 so angular momentum conserved) there must be some inital angular momentum from the putty.

So my question is even though the putty is thrown in a straight line and has no spin or rotational motion, it still posses angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nabeel17 said:
So my question is even though the putty is thrown in a straight line and has no spin or rotational motion, it still posses angular momentum?
Yes.

Even a point mass has angular momentum with respect to some reference frame. That essentially is how angular momentum is defined. The angular momentum of a system of particles is the sum of the angular momenta of the individual particles.
 
D H said:
Yes.

Even a point mass has angular momentum with respect to some reference frame. That essentially is how angular momentum is defined. The angular momentum of a system of particles is the sum of the angular momenta of the individual particles.

Ok so with respect to some origin, a point mass will have angular momentum given by rxp where where r is the distance from the origin. Even if it appears to be going straight with no rotation correct? So angular momentum is always defined with respect to an origin
 
Exactly.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top