Can the 2nd Order Partial Derivative of a Function be Evaluated at (0,0)?

precondition
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
This is supposed to be year1 calculus question but I can't answer it.
If f:R_2-->R is 0 if (x,y)=(0,0) and xy(x_2-y_2)/(x_2+y_2) otherwise then evaluate 2nd order partial derivative DxDyf(0,0) and Dy,Dxf(0,0)
The thing is, I get some complicated looking expression for DxDyf(x,y) and I can't simply put x=0 and y=0 in that expression right? because it gives 0/0... What am I misunderstanding here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
or is it that DxDyf(0,0) is simply zero because at (0,0) the function is 0?
 
The derivative is defined for all (x,y) except (0,0), and its derivative at these points is just what you probably found (using the product rule, etc). If the function is differentiable, then its derivative is continuous, and so you can find the derivative at (0,0) by taking the limit. If not, then the derivative at (0,0) is undefined. If you need to be rigorous, you'll need to go back to the definition of the derivative in terms of limits.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top