Can the Beta Function be Solved? A Demonstration of the Beta Function Problem

Monts
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Beta Function Demonstration Problem.

I pushed the "Enter" key by accident and the topics name got ruined.

Good Day to everyone, I have this problem, (In the context of the Gamma and Beta functions) I have to demonstrate that:


Homework Statement



Demonstrate that http://img576.imageshack.us/i/integralsola.jpg/

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Homework Equations



Can I state that x=y so that tan^v(theta) can be expressed as the Trigonometric representation Beta Function?

The Attempt at a Solution



http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/1423/intento.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

So once i make the substitution, i try to solve the integral, if've use both variable change and integration by parts, but always get everything messy and far away from the desired result, if someone could please give a direction, is there some essential substition that I'm not making?, or some property of the function I'm not applying?

Any little direction you give i would gladly apreciatte

Note: I drew these equations on M.Word

Thank you all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that should be:

\int_0^{\pi/2} \tan^v(x)dx=\pi/2 \sec(\pi v/2)

Now suppose we have the definition:

\beta(x,y)=2\int_0^{\pi/2} \sin^{2x-1}(t)\cos^{2y-1}(t)dt

then representing tan in terms of sin and cos, can you figure what x and y are in terms of v, then once you get it into the beta format and then represent the beta function in terms of the gamma quotient (see mathworld on Beta), then represent that gamma quotient in terms of the secant function.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top