Can the fit equation accurately predict the discharging of a capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mlostrac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the discharging of a capacitor, highlighting that the initial high current decreases as voltage drops, leading to a slower discharge rate. The fit equation A*exp(−Cx)+B is related to the capacitor discharge equation V = Vo e^-t/RC by substituting A with Vo, B with 0, and C with 1/RC, where x represents time. When plotting voltage against time, adjusting A, B, and C can improve the fit to the theoretical model. However, achieving a perfect fit is uncommon due to experimental variability and measurement inaccuracies. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate modeling of capacitor behavior.
mlostrac
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm just doing a lab on the discharging of a capacitor.

The data collected shows that at first the current is large because the voltage is large, so charge is lost quickly and the voltage decreases rapidly. As charge is lost the voltage is reduced making the current smaller so the rate of discharging becomes progressively slower.

I'm just wondering how the fit equation A*exp(−Cx)+B relates to the equation for a discharging capacitor V = Vo e^-t/RC ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitute in the values for A, C, and B; while the variable x in your case is t, since you're viewing V as a function of time. so A=Vo, B = 0, and C = 1/RC.
 
y = A*exp(−Cx)+B is an approximation to V = Vo e^-t/RC, in the xy plane, in cartesian coordinates.
When you plot your results (V against t) you need to fiddle with the A,B and C constants till you get the best fit.
Theoretically there would be a perfect combination of these three numbers, that fits your data perfectly, but this is rarely seen in practise - say why.

A would be Vo. B moves the fit up/down the y-axis (its probably 0).
Then C is then 1/RC, sometimes called the time constant, tau.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top