Can the Hubble Telescope Detect Life on Distant Planets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mackay1011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets
AI Thread Summary
The Hubble Space Telescope, despite its impressive ability to observe distant galaxies, cannot detect small objects like trees on planets due to its limited resolution. Its resolution is 0.085 arc seconds, which translates to the ability to discern objects no smaller than 158 meters at the distance of the Moon. This limitation arises from the vast distances involved and the scale of celestial bodies. Consequently, while Hubble can identify exoplanets and study their atmospheres, it cannot directly observe life or small features on these distant worlds. The discussion highlights the distinction between distance and the telescope's magnification capabilities.
Mackay1011
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Looking at planets...

Hi, not sure if this is the right area for such a post but... I was just thinking if the Hubble space telescope can see for millions of light years then why can't it look at stars from other solor systems and search for planets and the look at the planet for life? After all it would be powerfull enough to look at a planet and see a tree?

I'm very new to all this stuff so if my question is ridiculous don't laugh lol :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Galaxies=big. Planets=small. Simple as that. The Hubble couldn't even see a tree on the moon. Don't confuse distance with magnification/size.

For some actual numbers, the Hubble's resolution is 0.085 arc sec. At a distance of 385,000 km, that gives a resolution of .158 km or 158m. That means the smallest object the Hubble could see on the moon would be 158m across.
 
Last edited:


Ohh, well that's my question answerd lol, thanks :D
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top