Can the KE of a car be converted into work by stopping it at 100 km/hr?

AI Thread Summary
To stop a 1000 kg car traveling at 100 km/hr, the kinetic energy (KE) can be calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv². The correct conversion of speed from km/hr to m/s is essential for accurate calculations, where 100 km/hr converts to approximately 27.78 m/s. After conversion, the kinetic energy should be calculated as KE = 1/2(1000 kg)(27.78 m/s)², resulting in approximately 386,000 J. The discussion highlights the importance of proper unit conversion to avoid errors in calculations. Ultimately, the work done to stop the car equals the kinetic energy, confirming that all KE is converted into work.
rueberry
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
How much work is required to stop a 1000 kg car traveling at 100 km/hr?

What I was thinking was that I would use the formula for KE,
KE=1/2mv2 (last two of course is for squared
since the KE would equal work. I have gotten as far as:

KE= 1/2(1000 kg)(100km/hr)2

I am assuming that somewhere there is a conversion needed, I'm just not getting the next steps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which next steps? Just convert the km/hr into m/s and you're done.
 
Then maybe I'm not setting up the conversion correctly, I was using dimensional analysis and set it up

(100 km/hr) (1000m) (3600 sec) = 3.6 x 10^8
(1 km) (1 hr)

but I know this is wrong, by the time you square it and finish the equation, its way too big. The answer in the book is 386,000J, but I keep getting answers with 360 b/c of the sec. I'm sure this is a simple mistake I'm making, but I'm still stuck. Sorry.
 
the hour is on the bottom!
your conversion factors should be
(1000 m)/(1 km) * (1 hr)/(3600 s)

I suppose here, 100% of the Work removes KE.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top