Can the value of a be solved for in the infinite series convergence equation?

camilus
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
\sum^{\infty}_{x=1} \frac{cos(14.1347 \ln (x))}{x^{a}} = 0

Is there a way to solve for a? I don't think so but maybe someone here will have an insight as to what to do..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This equation is

(1/2)\Re \zeta(a-ui) = 0

for u = 14.1347, where \Re signifies the real part, and \zeta is the Riemann zeta function.

The attached picture shows the graph (I did it without the factor 1/2). The .mw file is the Maple code that generated this picture.

So a=1/2 looks like the solution. If we replace u=14.1347 by the nearby zero of the zeta function u = 14.134725141734693790\cdots then the solution would be exactly a=1/2 of course.

Caveat. Probably the original series converges only for a > 1 , so my analysis applies only to the analytic continuation.
 

Attachments

  • zeta.jpg
    zeta.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 492
  • zeta.mw
    zeta.mw
    29.9 KB · Views: 448
g_edgar said:
This equation is

(1/2)\Re \zeta(a-ui) = 0

for u = 14.1347, where \Re signifies the real part, and \zeta is the Riemann zeta function.

The attached picture shows the graph (I did it without the factor 1/2). The .mw file is the Maple code that generated this picture.

So a=1/2 looks like the solution. If we replace u=14.1347 by the nearby zero of the zeta function u = 14.134725141734693790\cdots then the solution would be exactly a=1/2 of course.

Caveat. Probably the original series converges only for a > 1 , so my analysis applies only to the analytic continuation.


OMG brilliant! Thanks! I realized this a few days ago, and just realized now that I realized it, and it looks a bit clearer now. weird.. but I am not complaining, thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top