Can the value of pi be found through integration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndersHermansson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AndersHermansson
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to find an exact solution for this integral?

∫√(1-x*x)dx from 0 to 1

Is it possible to differentiate a root expression?

I found that:
pi = 4 * ∫√(1-x*x)dx from 0 to 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the equation is for a semicircle of radius 1 from 0 to 1 you get a quarter circle and 1/4 pi *r^2=1/4pi

1/4pi is the answer
you could also evaluate the integral using a trig subsitution

you already found the answer if you divide both sides of the equation by 4 in your solution you also get the answer
 
Last edited:
for the trig sub

x=sin(θ)
dx=cos(θ)dθ
substitute into original integral simpligy trig expresion and switch limits of integration (evaluate interms of theta) and you will get &pi/4

if you haven't learned trig subs check it out in your calc book it not a very hard topic.
 
what is x*? is x a complex variable? i don t quite understand your integral
 
Probably because it's a lot easier than you're used to. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top