Can Time Differ in Nested Cylinders Traveling at Near-Light Speed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of time and light travel in nested cylinders moving at near-light speed. Cylinder A contains mirror-laser clocks, while Cylinders B and C, which are smaller and traveling at .9999 the speed of light, have additional features like windows and laser clocks. The main question posed is whether light traveling through the windows of the moving cylinders will record different times compared to light bouncing within an empty Cylinder A. Participants clarify that reference frames are not physical objects, and the speed of light remains constant in a vacuum, regardless of the motion of the cylinders. The introduction of plasma in Cylinder C raises further questions about how it might affect light speed.
pmurphy4
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
There is a hollow cylinder out in space (Cylinder A), shaped like a giant soda straw. Inside the cylinder are mirror-laser clocks keeping time by bouncing light back and forth across the Cylinder A's diameter.

A similar cylinder of slightly smaller diameter (Cylinder B) is traveling at .9999 of the speed of light relative to Cylinder A. In addition to the mirror clocks, it has several evenly spaced holes along its sides, like the windows of an airliner. From a relatively stationary point outside of Cylinder A, Cylinder B appears to be traveling from right to left. Cylinder B also has a series of laser clocks, some placed opposite windows and some placed opposite mirrors within the cylinder, so its lasers can point at a mirror inside itself or shoot a laser out of a window.

Cylinder C is similar to Cylinder B, except it is slightly smaller in diameter. Cylinder C is traveling at .9999 of the speed of light from left to right relative to Cylinder A.

Cylinder B passes through Cylinder A and Cylinder C passes through Cylinder B, which is also inside of Cylinder A, so that all three cylinders appear to line up perfectly for an instant for an observer standing relatively stationary outside of Cylinder A.

If the light from a laser clock in Cylinder A travels through the windows of the other nested cylinders' walls, ABCCBABCCBA, will the time recorded be different than when light just bounces back and forth through the diameter of an empty Cylinder A?

If "No", because only the space actually occupied by the material moving with B and C (the cylinder walls) is in a different frame of reference than A, then what if Cylinder C held a plasma in a magnetic field that A's light passed through?

I'm sure you can think of many more variations of this scenario, like half-silvered mirrors bouncing light off different combinations of mirrors in different cylinders and making the light zig zag left and right down the length of the B and C cylinders before returning to a clock in A.

Thanks for your input!
-Paul Murphy
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Paul! Welcome to PF! :smile:
pmurphy4 said:
If the light from a laser clock in Cylinder A travels through the windows of the other nested cylinders' walls, ABCCBABCCBA, will the time recorded be different than when light just bounces back and forth through the diameter of an empty Cylinder A?

If "No", because only the space actually occupied by the material moving with B and C (the cylinder walls) is in a different frame of reference than A …

"the space actually occupied … is in a different frame of reference than A" …

nooo … space is in all reference frames …

a reference frame isn't a physical object, it's just a way of measuring … it measures anything, at any speed, and in any combinations.

light passing through space in cylinder B (or C) isn't like light passing through air … the air will be moving at the same speed as B, and the speed of light through that air will depend on that speed … but the speed of light through (empty) space is c anyway. :wink:
, then what if Cylinder C held a plasma in a magnetic field that A's light passed through?

plasma slows light, just like air (not sure about the magnetic field, though :redface:)
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
42
Views
636
2
Replies
96
Views
9K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top