Can Time Dilation Help Break the 100m Dash Record?

jinksys
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An athlete has learned enough physics to know that if he measures from the Earth a time interval on a moving spacecraft , what he finds will be grater than what somebody on the spacecraft would measure. He therefore proposes to set a world record for the 100m dash by having his time taken by an observer on a moving spacecraft . Is this a good idea?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



An athlete has learned enough physics to know that if he measures from the Earth a time interval on a moving spacecraft , what he finds will be grater than what somebody on the spacecraft would measure.

WUT?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To do this problem, first you need to have some understanding about time dilation and length contraction. It would be a good idea to get background information up on these subjects. That's wut.
 
kuruman said:
To do this problem, first you need to have some understanding about time dilation and length contraction. It would be a good idea to get background information up on these subjects. That's wut.

Is the observer on the ship taking the time measurement using a clock on the ship or a clock on the ground?
 
The observer on the ship measures time with a clock that is at rest with him/her.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top