B Can ultracapacitors be used to split CO2 into carbon and oxygen?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of using ultracapacitors to split CO2 into carbon and oxygen. It highlights the significant energy requirement of approximately 1600 kJ/mole to break down CO2, translating to an impractical temperature of around 200,000 K for molecular separation. The initial calculations for determining the energy needed per gram of CO2 were criticized for leading to unreasonable temperature estimates. Additionally, it was noted that applying an electric field from ultracapacitors is unlikely to effectively separate CO2 molecules due to their neutral charge. Alternative methods, such as pressurizing CO2 and adding an electrolyte, were suggested for potential separation.
PlanetGazer8350
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
I have been researching on the bonding energies of different compounds, and for example, for CO2 it is 1600kJ/mole, 1600kJ/44g, or ~36.37kJ/g of energy required to split the carbon dioxide into carbon and oxygen. Furthermore, I transformed the amount of energy required in kJ to degrees celsius, and got 845.2 Cº for splitting 44g (or 1 mole), or 19.15 Cº for splitting 1 gram of CO2. However, the latter figure, as you may have noticed, is clearly absurd, as you logically cannot split 1 gram of CO2 with such a relatively low temperature.

I clearly understand that I am following the wrong procedure, although it seems the logical one at first, until, of course you arrive at an unreasonable figure. How should I find the required temperature for splitting a certain quantity of a compound? Also, why is my procedure wrong, and what have I not understood correctly?

Finally, I have also considered using a set of ultracapacitors connected together as an option to splitting CO2, (already having considered the amount of ultracapacitors needed): for example, to achieve an energy of ~36.37kJ (to split 1 gram of CO2) I would need 20 ultracapacitors with (individually) a voltage of 2.7V and capacitance of 500 farads. Would it be possible to split CO2 using ultracapacitors, or is this procedure also wrong, and why?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1600 kJ/mole is ## 1.6 \cdot 10^6 \,J/(6.02 \cdot 10^{23})= 2.7 \cdot 10^{-18} \, J/ ##molecule. This will only be approximate, but with ## k_B=1.38 \cdot 10^{-23} \, J/K ##, the temperature ## T \approx 2 \cdot 10^5 ## to separate the ## CO_2 ## molecule into atoms by thermal means. ## \\ ## And putting the molecule into a strong electric field, such as between capacitor plates is not likely to separate it into components. The ## CO_2## molecule is electrically neutral and only slightly polar. It would not be affected appreciably by the voltage from two capacitor plates.
 
Last edited:
However, if the CO2 was pressurized and turned into liquid, adding an electrolyte, would it be possible to split the CO2 into its components?

Edit: is the temperature (T): 2·105 the temperature required to split 1 molecule of CO2, in degrees kelvin? In addition, I now understand that your procedure is the correct one, but why exactly is my procedure wrong, (1600kJ/44g to get energy for 1 gram and then transform ~36.37kJ to celsius: 19.15 cº (which I know is wrong)), as it seems the most logical & proper one at first hand, and how to avoid these type of procedures on other concepts?
 
Last edited:
The calculation shows energy ## E=2.7 \cdot 10^{-18} ## Joules/molecule. At a temperature of ## T=200,000 \, K ##, thermal energy will break most of the bonds in these molecules. That is only an approximate calculation, and each of the bond energies will actually be 1/2 of what I used above. This is only approximate, but it basically says that ## CO_2 ## is a very stable molecule. One way of getting ## O_2 ## in a process with ## CO_2 ## is by photosynthesis: ## CO_2+H_2 O \rightarrow CH_2O+O_2 ##. There have recently been attempts to do this process artificially, but it hasn't yet been achieved on a large scale. See e.g. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/breaking-down-carbon-dioxide.916913/#post-5778727
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top