cragar
- 2,546
- 3
would we need anti-tungsten to do it.
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of powering a light bulb using positrons and the implications of using antimatter components. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving antimatter materials and the potential outcomes of such an experiment.
Participants express various speculative ideas about the requirements for an antimatter light bulb and the implications for astrophysical observations. There is no consensus on the practicality or implications of these ideas, and multiple competing views remain.
Assumptions about the behavior of antimatter and the conditions necessary for its use in practical applications are not fully explored, and the discussion includes speculative elements regarding astrophysical phenomena.
That would be anti-argon (and a little anti-nitrogen). We'd also need anti-silicon and anti-oxygen. I suppose we could suspend it magnetically so we wouldn't need anti-air.mgb_phys said:Yes and anti-copper, and anti whatever gas is in the lightbulb
mgb_phys said:RE positrons in our light bulbs
Assuming you had the anti-tungsten filament suspended somehow so that it didn't have to touch the seal at the base of the bulb and you had a perfect vacuum in the bulb so you didn't have to worry about gas molecules hitting the anti-tugsten filament.
Then, yes it would work perfectly normally and you wouldn't be able to tell that the photons emitted were from anti-matter
You can't - the only reason to think they aren't is that you don't see the x-rays from where their anti-interstellar medium meets out interstellar medium.Bob S said:how would we determine whether some (half?) of the millions of galaxies we see through the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and other telescopes were made of antimatter?