Can we see our own galaxy out there due to gravitational effects?

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational lensing allows light from distant galaxies to bend around massive objects, creating multiple images of those galaxies, but it does not enable us to see our own Milky Way in this manner. The light from these duplicate images is not from the same moment in time, as it takes varying paths and durations to reach us. To achieve such lensing effects, a cluster of galaxies is required, not just a single galaxy. While light can orbit black holes, the likelihood of seeing a distant version of the Milky Way is extremely low and remains speculative. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that we cannot view our own galaxy through gravitational effects.
NWH
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
This is a bit of a dumb question, so I apologise for the bluntness, but I was wondering. Can we see our own Milky Way out there in space due to gravitational effects? I understand that gravity allows us to view single galaxies in duplicate positions across the sky, it made me question whether we can see our own galaxy out there somewhere due to similar effects.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
NWH said:
This is a bit of a dumb question, so I apologise for the bluntness, but I was wondering. Can we see our own Milky Way out there in space due to gravitational effects? I understand that gravity allows us to view single galaxies in duplicate positions across the sky, it made me question whether we can see our own galaxy out there somewhere due to similar effects.

No.

You can get gravitational lensing resulting in light taking very slightly different paths over enormous distances, as it is curved by passing around a large cluster of galaxies, and this results in multiple images of other galaxies far behind the cluster. But there's not enough mass to turn light right around.

Here's a Hubble photo showing multiple images of the same galaxy.
148928main_image_feature_575_ys_4.jpg

(source; Hubble Captures A "Five-Star" Rated Gravitational Lens, NASA)
 
Yeah, I figured the answer would be blunt, thanks. So, these duplicate galaxies we're viewing, are they from precicely the same moment time? Or are we viewing the galaxies from different moments in time?

In that picture you posted, what is the body which is bending the light? Is it visible in this picture?
 
NWH said:
Yeah, I figured the answer would be blunt, thanks. So, these duplicate galaxies we're viewing, are they from precicely the same moment time? Or are we viewing the galaxies from different moments in time?

In that picture you posted, what is the body which is bending the light? Is it visible in this picture?

Images are from different times, depending on how long light took on that particular path.

To get an effect like this, you need a whole cluster of galaxies, not a single body. I think that the other galaxies you see in the image are part of that cluster.
 
How would you know if you were looking at a distant version of the MW? I seriously doubt that is possible, but, how would you know?
 
From what I have read on other forums, it is possible for light to orbit a black hole.
If this is the case, is it also possible for light to travel in the opposite direction in the same way that Apollo 13 used the Moon's gravity to return to Earth?
Of course the odds would be astronomically small of this happening, but isn't this still possible?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top