Can We Use Huckel's Rule to Determine Aromaticity in 1,4-Benzoquinone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter warenzeichen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Huckel's rule to determine the aromaticity of 1,4-Benzoquinone. Participants explore the implications of pi electron count, resonance structures, and the concept of aromaticity in relation to this compound.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the application of Huckel's rule, particularly regarding the count of pi electrons and the movement of electrons between carbon and oxygen.
  • There is a suggestion that resonance structures should be considered when counting pi electrons, raising questions about the fully delocalized nature of the system.
  • One participant notes that Huckel's rule is derived from molecular orbital theory, questioning the relevance of resonance structures in this context.
  • Another participant mentions that aromaticity is not a well-defined concept and references experimental results such as NMR shifts and diamagnetic ring currents as additional factors to consider.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of extensive mathematics in understanding aromaticity in simple molecules, with a focus on tautomers and resonance structures affecting aromaticity.
  • A later reply suggests that while one resonance structure may not be aromatic, another tautomer could potentially exhibit aromaticity, depending on the electron distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the aromaticity of 1,4-Benzoquinone, with multiple competing views on the relevance of Huckel's rule, resonance structures, and the overall definition of aromaticity.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential ambiguity in defining aromaticity, the dependence on resonance structures, and the unresolved nature of mathematical explanations related to the compound's properties.

warenzeichen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am not sure how to use Huckel's rule to determine whether this compound is aromatic or not. It seems that inside the ring, there are only 4 pi electrons, and can the e- between C and oxygen move towards the ring?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
warenzeichen said:
can the e- between C and oxygen move towards the ring?

I'll give you a hint: They can't.
 
when we count the no of pi e- , don't we consider the "possible resonance" structure?
Also, can we say this is a "fully delocalized" system?
 
but for C=O , is it possible for us to draw as -C-O+ for prediction( although C is less electronegative than O)
for molecules with alternative resonance structure, do we need to consider all ?
 
Hueckels rule is derived from MO theory, why do you want to count resonance structures then?
 
so it is really inside the ring?
 
Certainly to some degree. But aromaticity is not a totally well defined concept and Hueckels rules can sometimes be misleading. What about a diamagnetic ring current? NMR shifts of the Carbons and Hydrogens? Are there any experimental results?
 
I wasn't anticipated to use extensive mathematics to explain simple molecules in intermediate organic chemistry courses. I think Huckel's rule is sufficient to explain them. But there are tautomers / one of the resonance structures . Hence, it is important to consider the structure to see if one of them got aromaticity in one structure (e.g. keto-enol tautomerism)


anyway, the compound is not aromatic.
 
  • #10
warenzeichen said:
I wasn't anticipated to use extensive mathematics to explain simple molecules in intermediate organic chemistry courses. I think Huckel's rule is sufficient to explain them. But there are tautomers / one of the resonance structures . Hence, it is important to consider the structure to see if one of them got aromaticity in one structure (e.g. keto-enol tautomerism)


anyway, the compound is not aromatic.

If you were to produce the correct tautomer, you would have a zwitterion where the formal charges were on the oxygens. In that case the ring itself would be aromatic. But if you consider the ground state, it isn't. That zwitterion is waay higher in energy than the rather modest aromatic stabilization energy you get as a result of shuffling the electrons into just the right locations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
62K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K