Can You Calculate Torque on an Anemometer Based on Wind Speed and Dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponjavic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the torque on an anemometer is feasible if the wind speed and dimensions, including radius and cup radius, are known. The torque can be determined using the formula T = F x r, where F represents the wind force on the anemometer cups and r is the distance from the rotation axis. If the anemometer operates at a constant speed with frictionless bearings, the torque is zero. Without knowing the wind speed, torque calculation becomes impossible. Similar devices, like wind turbines or propellers, can also have their torque calculated using the same principles.
ponjavic
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to calculate the torque on an anemometer, of radius x with cupradius y, depending on the wind speed?
If not is there a similar horizontally rotating device with which you can calculate the torque?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the anemometer is turning at a constant speed, and we assume that the bearings it is turning on are frictionless, then the torque is zero.
 


Yes, it is possible to calculate the torque on an anemometer, as long as the wind speed and the dimensions of the anemometer (radius and cup radius) are known. The formula for calculating torque is T = F x r, where T is the torque, F is the force applied, and r is the distance from the axis of rotation. In this case, the force applied is the force of the wind on the cups of the anemometer, and the distance from the axis of rotation can be calculated using the radius and cup radius of the anemometer.

If the wind speed is not known, it is not possible to calculate the torque on the anemometer. However, there are other horizontally rotating devices such as wind turbines or propellers that can be used to calculate torque. These devices also work by converting the force of the wind into rotational motion, and the torque can be calculated using the same formula.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top