Can You Convert Watt-Hours to Watts in Energy Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tacojohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Watts
tacojohn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An automobile gets 20 miles per gallon when traveling at 60 miles per hour. With the energy content of gasoline at 36,000 watt-hr per gallon, convert this amount of power into watts.

Homework Equations



W h (watt hours) | ([length]^2 [mass])/[time]^2 | energy
W (watts) | ([length]^2 [mass])/[time]^3 | power

Energy = Power (60) * time (3) = 60 x 3 = 180 Wh

The Attempt at a Solution



If watt-hrs and watts are not compatible how am I supposed to convert these?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not expected to convert the 36,000 watt-hr to watts. As you noted, it cannot be done. The power that you need to find is the energy per unit time that this car consumes as it travels at 60 miles per hour.
 
Energy is ususally measured in Joules (J)
Power is the rate of change of energy - ie. how much energy you are using in a given time. Usually measuered in Watts = Joules per second (W = J/s)

so work out how much fuel the car consumes per time unit, then convert that to how much energy per time unit & you have power - pow
 
Last edited:
Correct-o.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top