MHB Can You Solve This Equation with Quadratic Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$ simplifies to a quartic equation $$x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0$$ after multiplying by $(x+1)^2$. Graphing reveals two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62$. The quartic factors into $(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3)$, leading to exact solutions for the real roots as $$x = \frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$. Both methods discussed confirm the same solutions, demonstrating effective approaches to solving the original equation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Solve $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$
Multiply by $(x+1)^2$ to get $(x^2-3)(x+1)^2 + x^2 = 0$, or $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0.$ A graphing calculator shows that the quartic equation has two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62.$ The only hope of finding the exact values is if the quartic has two quadratic factors. Since the sum of those two roots looks as though it is close to $1$, and their product close to $-1$, one of the factors ought to be $x^2 -x - 1.$ Sure enough, you find that $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3).$ So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
 
Thanks Opalg, for your analysis of the problem and the correct solutions as well.

I feel somewhat reticent to post my 'silly' method but at the same time, I wanted to know if this is what we could actually do to solve an equation...

My solution:

Let $$k=x+1$$, we now have

$$(k-1)^2+\frac {(k-1)^2}{k^2}=3$$

$$k^2(k-1)^2+(k-1)^2=3k^2$$

$$(k-1)^2(k^2+1)=3k^2$$

We see that one of the possibilities that this equation can be rewritten is in the following manner:

$$(k-1)^2=k$$ and $$(k^2+1)=3k$$

For the first case, we simplify it to get:

$$k^2-3k+1=0$$

And for the second case, we also do the simplification and obtain:

$$k^2-3k+1=0$$

This means if we solve the equation $$k^2-3k+1=0$$, we will also solve the original equation.

Thus, $$k=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{9-4}}{2}=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Hence:

$$x=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}-1=\frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Edit: I have actually looked at all of the factor pair combinations in order to rewrite the equation $$(k-1)^2(k^2+1)=3k^2$$ as two equivalent equations, and the one that I gave above was the only combination yielding real solutions.
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
Multiply by $(x+1)^2$ to get $(x^2-3)(x+1)^2 + x^2 = 0$, or $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0.$ A graphing calculator shows that the quartic equation has two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62.$ The only hope of finding the exact values is if the quartic has two quadratic factors. Since the sum of those two roots looks as though it is close to $1$, and their product close to $-1$, one of the factors ought to be $x^2 -x - 1.$ Sure enough, you find that $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3).$ So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
proceed as Opalg's solution : factoring f(x)

$f(x)=x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=x^4+2x^3-3x-x^2-3x-3$

$=x(x^3+2x^2-3)-(x^2+3x+3)$

$=x(x^2+3x+3)(x-1)-(x^2+3x+3)$

$=(x^2-x-1)(x^2+3x+3)=0$

So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top