MHB Can You Solve This Equation with Quadratic Formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$ simplifies to a quartic equation $$x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0$$ after multiplying by $(x+1)^2$. Graphing reveals two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62$. The quartic factors into $(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3)$, leading to exact solutions for the real roots as $$x = \frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$. Both methods discussed confirm the same solutions, demonstrating effective approaches to solving the original equation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Solve $$x^2+\frac{x^2}{(x+1)^2}=3$$
Multiply by $(x+1)^2$ to get $(x^2-3)(x+1)^2 + x^2 = 0$, or $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0.$ A graphing calculator shows that the quartic equation has two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62.$ The only hope of finding the exact values is if the quartic has two quadratic factors. Since the sum of those two roots looks as though it is close to $1$, and their product close to $-1$, one of the factors ought to be $x^2 -x - 1.$ Sure enough, you find that $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3).$ So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
 
Thanks Opalg, for your analysis of the problem and the correct solutions as well.

I feel somewhat reticent to post my 'silly' method but at the same time, I wanted to know if this is what we could actually do to solve an equation...

My solution:

Let $$k=x+1$$, we now have

$$(k-1)^2+\frac {(k-1)^2}{k^2}=3$$

$$k^2(k-1)^2+(k-1)^2=3k^2$$

$$(k-1)^2(k^2+1)=3k^2$$

We see that one of the possibilities that this equation can be rewritten is in the following manner:

$$(k-1)^2=k$$ and $$(k^2+1)=3k$$

For the first case, we simplify it to get:

$$k^2-3k+1=0$$

And for the second case, we also do the simplification and obtain:

$$k^2-3k+1=0$$

This means if we solve the equation $$k^2-3k+1=0$$, we will also solve the original equation.

Thus, $$k=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{9-4}}{2}=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Hence:

$$x=\frac{3\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}-1=\frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$$

Edit: I have actually looked at all of the factor pair combinations in order to rewrite the equation $$(k-1)^2(k^2+1)=3k^2$$ as two equivalent equations, and the one that I gave above was the only combination yielding real solutions.
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
Multiply by $(x+1)^2$ to get $(x^2-3)(x+1)^2 + x^2 = 0$, or $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0.$ A graphing calculator shows that the quartic equation has two real roots, approximately $1.62$ and $-0.62.$ The only hope of finding the exact values is if the quartic has two quadratic factors. Since the sum of those two roots looks as though it is close to $1$, and their product close to $-1$, one of the factors ought to be $x^2 -x - 1.$ Sure enough, you find that $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=(x^2 -x - 1)(x^2+3x+3).$ So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
proceed as Opalg's solution : factoring f(x)

$f(x)=x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=x^4+2x^3-3x-x^2-3x-3$

$=x(x^3+2x^2-3)-(x^2+3x+3)$

$=x(x^2+3x+3)(x-1)-(x^2+3x+3)$

$=(x^2-x-1)(x^2+3x+3)=0$

So the (real) roots are those of the first factor, namely $x = \frac12\bigl(1\pm\sqrt5\bigr).$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top