Can you write the ideal gas law this way?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating work done in an adiabatic process using the ideal gas law. The attempt to rewrite the ideal gas law as ΔPΔV=nRΔT is incorrect because pressure and volume change during the process, making dP and dV functions rather than constants. Instead, it's recommended to use the internal energy change equation for adiabatic processes, ΔU = -W(gas), to find the work done. To solve the problem, one should first determine the initial and final temperatures using the ideal gas law, PV=nRT, and then substitute these values into the work equation. Proper application of these principles is crucial for obtaining the correct answer.
mm2424
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the work done in an adiabatic process where P1 = 1.2 atm, V1 = 0.2 m^3, P2 = 2.4 atm and V2 = 0.117 m^3

Homework Equations


W=-nCvΔT
PV=nRT


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to group the work formula as follows:
W=-(nΔT)Cv

and then tried to rewrite the ideal gas law the following way:

ΔPΔV=nRΔT
nΔT = (ΔPΔV)/R

then I rewrote the Work equation as

W=-Cv(ΔPΔV)/R

However, this did not yield the correct answer. I imagine the problem arises in my rewriting of the ideal gas law...is it never ok to express the ideal gas law in this way?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mm2424 said:

Homework Equations


W=-nCvΔT
PV=nRT

I tried to group the work formula as follows:
W=-(nΔT)Cv

and then tried to rewrite the ideal gas law the following way:

ΔPΔV=nRΔT

You can not write the ideal gas low in that way! For a very little step, you can write nRdT = d(PV)=dP V+dV P. Both P and V change during the process, so the factors of dV and dP are not constants. They are functions.

So it is better to use the basic equation for change of the internal energy in the adiabatic process Δ U= -W(gas), that is Cvn(T2-T1)=-W(gas)
Determine T1 a and T2 from the given P and V data using the ideal gas law, PV=nRT, and substitute them in the equation for W(gas)ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top