Explaining the Physics of a Rolling Cannon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explains the physics behind a rolling cannon firing a cannonball, emphasizing the law of conservation of momentum. When the cannonball is fired, both the cannon and the cannonball have equal magnitudes of momentum but in opposite directions. The cannonball's smaller mass allows it to achieve a higher velocity compared to the cannon's larger mass, resulting in a modest recoil. It is clarified that while the momenta are equal in magnitude, they are not equal as vectors due to their opposite directions. This illustrates the relationship between mass and velocity in momentum conservation.
eraemia
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine a cannon that is free to roll on wheels. Initially, both the cannon and cannonball are at rest. When the cannonball is fired, though, the momentum transferred to the cannonball comes at the expense of the cannon, so the cannonball and cannon end up with momenta having equal magnitudes but opposite directions. If this is so, why does the cannonball fly away at a large speed while the cannon recoils only very modestly? Explain your response.

Homework Equations



Law of Conservation of Momentum
Newton's Third Law

The Attempt at a Solution



According to the law of conservation of momentum, the momentum of the canon would equal the momentum of the canonball. Since momentum is mv, the cannon's large mass would account for its smaller velocity/recoil, compared with the canonball's smaller mass and greater velocity. Is this right? What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you're missing anything. Your answer is correct. Except that where you said "the momentum of the canon would equal the momentum of the canonball" you should take care to note that they are in opposite direction and so momentum (a vector) is not equal, but only equal in magnitude.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top