Canoe Velocity Relative to River: 0.413m/s

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a canoe relative to a river, given its velocity relative to the earth and the river's flow speed. The canoe's velocity is 0.360 m/s southeast, while the river flows at 0.580 m/s east. The correct magnitude of the canoe's velocity relative to the river is determined to be 0.413 m/s. The confusion arises from understanding why vector addition is necessary, as the canoe's velocity relative to the earth is a resultant vector that includes both the canoe's speed through the water and the river's current. The solution involves breaking down the velocities into their x and y components to accurately calculate the relative velocity.
zippeh
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A canoe has a velocity of 0.360m/s southeast (at 315°) relative to the earth. The canoe is on a river that is flowing at 0.580m/s east relative to the earth.

Find the magnitude of the velocity v⃗ c/r of the canoe relative to the river.


Homework Equations



Vx=V0cos(θ)
Vy=V0sin(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is Vc/r=0.413 m/s and the (Vc/r)x , (Vc/r)y =
-0.325,-0.255 ; respectively.


There are a few things I am confused about with the equations on the problem in general. Firstly, why do these equations work : Vx=V0cos(θ) and Vy=V0sin(θ).

I don't understand why I have to use these equations in the problem to obtain the Vx when the problem (to my understanding) gives me Vx and the Vy, which should be the value of Vc/r since this should be just simple vector addition. This is what I am thinking (see attachments). The magnitude of the velocity of Vc/r = Vc/e - Vr/e. So, Vc/e is given at a 315° angle at a velocity of .350m/s. Then using the head to tail method, -Vr/e is given at 180° at a velocity of .580m/s. Using the cos(315°)*.360, I should get -.255 for the magnitude of the velocity of Vc/r instead of .413. I know this is obviously wrong since you can't have a negative velocity in this problem, the way they have the positive and negative planes set up, but I just want to know why the other way works and why it isn't simple vector addition/subtraction. Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • p.png
    p.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 457
  • physics.png
    physics.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity of the canoe relative to the Earth is the resultant vector of the canoe's velocity relative to the river and of the velocity of the river relative to the earth.
 
That doesn't really help me, could you explain more in depth please?
 
vc/e = vr/e + vc/r

Solve the equation for vc/r by breaking the other two (given) velocities into their x (east) and y (north) components, then take the magnitude of the result. The given answer checks.

NOTE: the given velocity of the canoe w/r/t Earth is not the velocity the canoe would have w/r/t Earth in the absence of river flow. It's the actual canoe-to-earth velocity including the effect of the river flow.
 
The canoe's velocity consists of two components. Its velocity relative to the river, that is the person rowing it sees that he is rowing the canoe at a certain speed in a certain direction with respect to the water, but it is also carried by the river at a certain speed in a certain direction. So the canoe's velocity is the resultant of these two velocities.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top