Canonical transformations, generating function

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


Given the generating function F=\sum _i f_i (q_j,t)P_i,
1)Find the corresponding canonical transformations.
2)Show that the transformations of generalized coordinates are canonical transformations.
3)What meaning does the canonical transformation originated by the generating function \Phi (q,P)=\alpha qP has?

Homework Equations


p_i=\frac{\partial F }{\partial q_i}, P_i=-\frac{\partial F }{\partial Q_i}, H'=H+\frac{\partial F }{\partial t}.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to start. The notation confuses me, particularly the j. Should the sum be a sum over i and j?

Edit:1)Q_i=\frac{\partial F }{\partial P_i}=f_i(q_j,t). A canonical transformation is such that \dot Q_i=\frac{\partial H'}{\partial P_i} and \dot P_i =-\frac{\partial H'}{\partial Q_i}.
Therefore I guess I must verify that \frac{\partial ^2 F}{\partial t \partial P_i}=\dot Q_i and that... oh well I'm totally confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2)This is not really clear to me. I mean, I know that canonical transformations preserve the form of the Hamiltonian equations of motion, but how does this relate to the generating function?3)I'm guessing this means that the momentum and position are related by an exponential function, but I'm not sure.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top