Can't find all the zeroes of a polynomial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the zeros of the polynomial equation X^4 + 3x - 18, which the user struggles with due to a lack of prior knowledge on the topic. They attempted various methods, including factoring and using online calculators, but found the roots difficult to derive. Other participants suggest that numerical methods like the Newton-Raphson method could be useful, and some provide insights into the historical context of solving quartic equations. Ultimately, it is revealed that the original problem contained an error, and the correct equation should be X^4 + 3x^2 - 18, which can be factored more easily. The conversation highlights the challenges of polynomial equations and the importance of accurate problem statements in mathematics.
johnsonjohn
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Help i have a homework quiz done and i simply can't find out how to do the 3rd problem as we haven't even learned how to do it or maybe my notes aren't good or something , however I am close to an A in the class and this would help bring it closer. It asks me: "Find all the zeros of: X^4+3x-18". I have looked around online and only could find the rational theory to solve it( we haven't learned this) and it didnt even work. I am wondering if you guys could help me out.

Homework Equations



X^4+3x-18

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried factoring and stuff i learned in algerba 2 but that's all for quadratic equations how did Isaac Newton even figure this out? I used an online calculator and was given the roots -2.229 and 1.875 but i don't know how to get those roots.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are closed formulas to solve this equation (first found by Lodovico Ferrari (1522–1565), published by Gerolamo Cardano 1545), but they are rather unpleasant. I assume the online solutions use numerical procedures, e.g. the Newton-Raphson method (around 1700) which uses an iteration with tangents.

In some cases - not this one - one can guess a root and use polynomial division to reduce the degree.
 
fresh_42 said:
There are closed formulas to solve this equation (first found by Lodovico Ferrari (1522–1565), published by Gerolamo Cardano 1545), but they are rather unpleasant. I assume the online solutions use numerical procedures, e.g. the Newton-Raphson method (around 1700) which uses an iteration with tangents.

In some cases - not this one - one can guess a root and use polynomial division to reduce the degree.
thank you. This will help me find the answer more. I can't believe my teacher gave me a problem like this.
 
johnsonjohn said:

Homework Statement


Help i have a homework quiz done and i simply can't find out how to do the 3rd problem as we haven't even learned how to do it or maybe my notes aren't good or something , however I am close to an A in the class and this would help bring it closer. It asks me: "Find all the zeros of: X^4+3x-18". I have looked around online and only could find the rational theory to solve it( we haven't learned this) and it didn't even work. I'm wondering if you guys could help me out.

Homework Equations



X^4+3x-18

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried factoring and stuff i learned in algebra 2 but that's all for quadratic equations how did Isaac Newton even figure this out? I used an online calculator and was given the roots -2.229 and 1.875 but i don't know how to get those roots.
A graphing calculator can give you those results.

Are you sure that you copied the problem correctly?

The polynomial, x4 + 3x2 - 18, can be factored.
 
johnsonjohn said:
This will help me find the answer more.
If you're interested in only the formulas, then I have a Wiki link for you. Unfortunately not in English, but the formulas don't bother and I'm too lazy to translate the entire entry.
johnsonjohn said:
I can't believe my teacher gave me a problem like this.
... which is an indication that @SammyS is right and you made a copy and paste error with the formula.
 
SammyS said:
A graphing calculator can give you those results.

Are you sure that you copied the problem correctly?

The polynomial, x4 + 3x2 - 18, can be factored.
I don't have a phone on me, but that's the exact equation. Its literally unfactorable at my current level of math. Its x raised to the 4th plus 3x minus 18( x^4+3x-18)
 
fresh_42 said:
If you're interested in only the formulas, then I have a Wiki link for you. Unfortunately not in English, but the formulas don't bother and I'm too lazy to translate the entire entry.

... which is an indication that @SammyS is right and you made a copy and paste error with the formula.
I just need to be able to find out how to do this problem. I am trying to get a hundred percent on this.
 
johnsonjohn said:
I just need to be able to find out how to do this problem. I am trying to get a hundred percent on this.
Then have a look:
It's so overabundant with formulas that the wrong language is only a minor difficulty.

If you plot a graph you could see, how to apply Newton-Raphson:
Start with any tangent near a root. Intersect it with the x-axis, compute the function value there, and compute a tangent there. Then intersect again with the x-axis and so on.
(Edit: If I remember correctly. But the Wiki link to the method I posted above should be more precise.)
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
johnsonjohn said:

Homework Equations



X^4+3x-18

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried factoring and stuff i learned in algerba 2 but that's all for quadratic equations how did Isaac Newton even figure this out? I used an online calculator and was given the roots -2.229 and 1.875 but i don't know how to get those roots.
You can try an iterative procedure: start with some x value (say, x = -1 or x = 1 ) and calculate ##x'=\sqrt{\sqrt{3(6-x)}}##. Then repeat with x=x' till x and x' are close enough together.
 
  • #10
johnsonjohn said:
I don't have a phone on me, but that's the exact equation. Its literally unfactorable at my current level of math. Its x raised to the 4th plus 3x minus 18( x^4+3x-18)

Well, exact solutions are nasty in this case. For example, one of the two real roots is
-1/12/(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(1/6)*(2^(7/12)*(-2^(1/2)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/2)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)+48*2^(1/6)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/2)+12*2^(1/6)*3^(1/2)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/2)+2^(2/3)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(3/4))*3^(5/6)/(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/4)

Such formulas are hardly ever used in getting numerical answers; modern numerical root-finding algorithms are usually very fast and efficient and often more accurate (i.e, less susceptible to roundoff errors in computation).
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and OmCheeto
  • #11
Ray Vickson said:
Well, exact solutions are nasty in this case. For example, one of the two real roots is
-1/12/(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(1/6)*(2^(7/12)*(-2^(1/2)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/2)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)+48*2^(1/6)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/2)+12*2^(1/6)*3^(1/2)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/2)+2^(2/3)*(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(3/4))*3^(5/6)/(2^(1/3)*3^(2/3)*(3+3^(1/2)*2051^(1/2))^(2/3)-48)^(1/4)

Such formulas are hardly ever used in getting numerical answers; modern numerical root-finding algorithms are usually very fast and efficient and often more accurate (i.e, less susceptible to roundoff errors in computation).

It should be noted that "-2^(1/2)" is misinterpreted by some spreadsheets as: √(-2)
To correct this, I used the form: -(2^(1/2))

ps. I spent all day on this problem yesterday... When I finally saw the solutions for the quartic equation, I was very happy to hear that even mathematicians won't go there.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Well just answer that you cannot see and there does not seem to be any simple factorisation involving integers for the polynomial you quoted, but on the other hand if the question is ... (the equation suggested in #4) then you can factorise in the following way...

You might even get extra credit for that which after all would be earned because of the time you have spent on it. :oldsmile:
 
  • #13
epenguin said:
Well just answer that you cannot see and there does not seem to be any simple factorisation involving integers for the polynomial you quoted, but on the other hand if the question is ... (the equation suggested in #4) then you can factorise in the following way...

You might even get extra credit for that which after all would be earned because of the time you have spent on it. :oldsmile:
thank you and all you guys i should do pretty good on this quiz.
 
  • #14
Here's an alternative look.

A degree 4 polynomial with real coefficients has either 0 or 2 or 4 real zeros. (We know from the graph that the polynomial discussed here has 2 real zeros.) We can factor this polynomial into to quadratics, each with real coefficients. Thus we have:

x4 + 3x − 18 = (x2 + Ax + B)(x2 + Cx + D)

Expanding the right hand side and equating coefficients, gives 4 equations in 4 unknowns.

That gives somewhat of a road map.I found that the result of doing the above gave a cubic equation in A2 .
 
  • #15
SammyS said:
I found that the result of doing the above gave a cubic equation in A2 .

For the general quartic you always get this or a related cubic called 'the reducing cubic'whatever way you go about it.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Lol guys and gals i had the class today and the teacher said she made a mistake. It was supposed to be x^4+3x^2-18 lol ,but thanks for the help and it was a stimulating and challenging thing for all us i think( maybe just me you guys are smarter than me.)
 
  • #17
substitute y = x^2 in for x and solve the quadratic in y; then take square root of y to get x
 
  • #18
johnsonjohn said:
Lol guys and gals i had the class today and the teacher said she made a mistake. It was supposed to be x^4+3x^2-18 lol ,but thanks for the help

:approve: Yeah we told you she made that mistake :oldtongue: - but thanks for coming back to tell us. :oldsmile:
johnsonjohn said:
maybe just me you guys are smarter than me.)

It's practice - we don't always work things through ourselves to the answer, but we have had to get quite practiced in working out what the question was or should have been.
 
  • Like
Likes johnsonjohn and SammyS
  • #19
Now I see, a bit late. Apparently the initial problem cannot be solved by substitution
 
  • #20
OmCheeto said:
ps. I spent all day on this problem yesterday... When I finally saw the solutions for the quartic equation, I was very happy to hear that even mathematicians won't go there.
Quite the opposite. The "usual" mathematician is proud of not to know how to calculate other than ±1 * ±2. :smile:
 
Back
Top