Can't understand my books diagram?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rijad Hadzic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Diagram
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding a diagram and graphs related to an AC circuit in a textbook. The user questions why the amplitude of the current appears higher than that of the potential, noting that the absence of a scale on the axes makes it difficult to draw conclusions about their relationship. Responses clarify that the graphs are not meant to be quantitative and simply illustrate that both current and potential vary sinusoidally and are in phase. The user expresses relief upon understanding this explanation. Overall, the key takeaway is that the graphs are qualitative rather than quantitative, emphasizing the sinusoidal nature of the AC circuit.
Rijad Hadzic
Messages
321
Reaction score
20

Homework Statement


This isn't a problem. I need help understanding a diagram and graphs from my book

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I'm given a diagram on an AC circuit and a resistor.

I am then given a graph of the potential of the resistor as a function of time, and then a graph of the current as a function of time.

Why does my book have the amplitude of the current higher than the potential? It makes no sense to me. The only case that the current will be larger than the potential is if 0<R<1 but it doesn't mention the value of R at all.

The section right after this is phasor diagrams and I don't think I will be able to understand this section enough if I am not even able to understand the graphs. Can someone please help me understand this..
 

Attachments

  • network-security.jpg
    network-security.jpg
    36.9 KB · Views: 467
  • 41a28A84XhL._SX422_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
    41a28A84XhL._SX422_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
Apologies I wasn't able to upload the whole thing. This post should have all the graphs.
 

Attachments

  • DG2Nyqh.jpg
    DG2Nyqh.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 454
As the axes have no units, you can't say that the amplitude of the current is higher than that of the potential. Even though the green arrow is longer than the red one, in the absence of a scale this means nothing (because I and V have different units). The graphs are not trying to be quantitative; they are just illustrating the general situation, i.e. that V and I both vary sinusoidally and in phase with each other.
 
mjc123 said:
As the axes have no units, you can't say that the amplitude of the current is higher than that of the potential. Even though the green arrow is longer than the red one, in the absence of a scale this means nothing (because I and V have different units). The graphs are not trying to be quantitative; they are just illustrating the general situation, i.e. that V and I both vary sinusoidally and in phase with each other.

Damn that makes sense. damn can't believe I couldn't figure that out myself smh man.. thank you though.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top