Can't we synthetically create helium-3 from decaying tritium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tritium
AI Thread Summary
Helium-3 can be synthetically created from decaying tritium, which raises the question of whether mining the moon for helium-3 is necessary, given the high costs and complexities involved. Currently, the majority of helium-3 in the U.S. is sourced from decaying tritium, primarily derived from nuclear weapons. Tritium is produced by irradiating lithium-6 and lithium-7 with neutrons, a process that is currently more cost-effective than lunar mining. However, the demand for helium-3 is low at present. If advancements in technology increase the demand for helium-3, particularly for applications like fusion power, and if space travel costs decrease significantly, lunar mining could become economically viable in the future.
Nayan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I am write can't we syntactically creat helium-3 from decayacing tritium if it is true we don't have to mine the moon for helium-3 because mining the moon is very costly and complicated so if we can sycnteticlly creat helium-3 we can save a lot of money
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
We get most of our helium-3 from decaying tritium right now (a lot of it in the US comes from tritium present in nuclear weapons). The real question should be: where does our supply of tritium come from? Right now, the vast majority (all?) of our tritium supply is bred by irradiating lithium-6 and lithium-7 with neutrons. This process is currently significantly cheaper than space travel to mine He-3, but the demand for He-3 is also very low. If some technology were developed to dramatically boost the demand for He-3 (say, fusion power), and space travel became dramatically cheaper, then at some point, it might be economically feasible to mine the moon for He-3.
 
  • Like
Likes HAYAO and Janosh89
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top