Can anyone explain the derivation of the formula for cantilever oscillations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of formulas for cantilever oscillations, specifically T=2(pi)*[(4ML^3)/(bd^3E)]^1/2 and h=4MgL^3/Ebd^3. The original poster is conducting an experiment to measure oscillation periods and heights by varying mass and cantilever length. They seek clarification on how these formulas are derived, referencing concepts from Hooke's law and simple harmonic motion. The conversation concludes with an explanation of the relationship between the derived formula for period and the motion's simple harmonic nature.
ash1098
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Cantilever Investigation

1.Hi,

I am writing a report on cantilever oscillations, my experiment involves fixing different cantilvers e.g. a ruler to the end of a table then measuring the period and height of oscillations while varing the mass attached to the cantilever, and other varients e.g. length of cantilever.


2. I have found these two formulae: (Shown much more clearly in attachments)

T= 2(pi)*[(4ML^3)/(bd^3E)]^1/2

and:

h= 4MgL^3/Ebd^3

where:
b= width of cantilever
d= thickness of cantilever
E= Youngs Modulus
M=Mass
L=Lenght of cantilever
T=period of oscillations
h=height of oscillation


3. I have looked at eqn's involving Hooke's and simple harmonic motion but cannot work out how these formulae have been derived.

Does anyone know how these formulae where derived, or where I can find information on this in general?

Thanks.

ash.

p.s. I have written out the formulae using math open office and attached them in pdf if it helps make them easier to read.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Well I have done a lab to find the Young's Modulus of a loaded cantilever and this is theory which is written down on the paper:

The depression,s,due to a load W(=Mg) at the end of a cantilever of length,l, is

s=\frac{Wl^3}{3IE}

This strain brings into play internal stresses which produce a restoring force equal to W, i.e. equal to \frac{3IEs}{l^3}.

If the acceleration of the load \frac{d^2s}{dt^2} when the cantilever is displaced to produce vertical oscillations,then

M\frac{d^2s}{dt^2}=\frac{-3IE}{l^3}s

OR
\frac{d^2s}{dt^2}+\frac{3IE}{Ml^3}s=0

Hence the motion is Simple harmonic and the periodic time,T, is

T=2\pi \sqrt{\frac{Ml^3}{3IE}}

from which

E=\frac{4\pi^2Ml^3}{3IT^2}

For a beam of rectangular section:
I=\frac{bd^3}{12}
I hope that helps in some way
 
Last edited:
Thanks for your reply rock.freak it's really really useful, just one question:

why does T=2\pi \sqrt{\frac{Ml^3}{3IE}}

Thanks, ash.
 
Well from
M\frac{d^2s}{dt^2}=\frac{-3IE}{l^3}s

\frac{d^2s}{dt^2}=\frac{-3IE}{Ml^3}s

and that is of the form a=-\omega^2 s where a=\frac{d^2s}{dt^2}

so from that

\omega=\sqrt{\frac{3IE}{Ml^3}}

and since it moves with SHM, the period,T, is given by

T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}
 
Oh yeah I see it now, Thanks alot.

Ash.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top