Capacitance Across Not-So-Parallel Plates

AI Thread Summary
Calculating capacitance across non-parallel plates, such as a stair-step configuration, can be approached in two ways. One method involves treating the two sections as separate parallel plate capacitors, using different distances for each. However, the perpendicular section of the stair-step complicates this approach, leading to the suggestion of integrating across the surface. If the angle of the step is small, the unexposed area can be neglected, allowing for a simplified treatment as two capacitors. For a more precise calculation, understanding the electric field near a conductor with an inside corner may be beneficial.
^eMpTy^
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to calculate the capacitance across a couple of parallel plates but, for fun, one of the plates looks like a stair step. So it has 2 sections facing one normal parallel plate at different distances.

I see two possibilities here, one being that I can simply treat the two sections as two sets of parallel plate capacitors and apply the appropriate formula using two different distances for each section.

However that leaves the perpendicular part of the stairstep unaccounted for. So my second thought was that I would have to do an integral across that part of the surface from one distance to the other. But since there is zero exposed surface area that is parallel to the regular straight plate, that doesn't quite make sense to me either.

If that all made sense to you...can you kick me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!Yas

Actually the angle is very small and therefore the unexposed area can be neglected.

You have to integrate.

I think this in "Concepts of physics" by Resnik and Halliday. I have solved it earlier.
 
If the step has "really small Area"
(compared to the total plate Area),
just treat it like 2 capacitors.

alternate way of deciding:
If you know how to find the E-field near
a conductor with an inside corner like that,
accounting for the varying charge density,
then go for it.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top