Capacitance in concentric shells

  • Thread starter Thread starter OptimusPwn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total capacitance of a system with four concentric spherical metal shells of varying radii, where the two inner shells are connected by a wire. The approach involves assuming a charge +Q on the inner sphere and using Gauss's law to determine the electric field between the shells. The user expresses confusion about integrating to find the potential difference and whether to integrate the electric fields or distances. Responses indicate that the electric fields provided are incorrect and emphasize the need to focus on the regions between the spheres rather than applying V=Ed directly. Clarification on the relationship between electric field and potential difference is suggested for better understanding.
OptimusPwn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider four concentric spherical metal
shells of radii r, 2r, 3r, and 4r. The middle
two shells are connected by wire, as shown.
What is the total capacitance of the system?
In your solution, clearly explain your method.

Homework Equations



u= 1/2cv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


So my teacher told us to assume we can hook it up to a battery(voltage) and that the two inner shells have the same charge and to evaluate the potential inner to outer, but I have no idea how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a number of details you'll have to figure out for yourself, but here's generally how to approach the problem. Assume there is a charge +Q on the inner sphere. Use Gauss's law to calculate the electric field between the spheres. You'll have to figure out what the charge of the other spheres as well. Once you know the electric field, you can integrate it to calculate the potential difference between the spheres.
 
So when I do that I get

E(r)= Q/4(pi)(R)2Epilsonknot


E(2r)=Q/4(pi)(2R)2Epilsonknot


E(3r)=Q/4(pi)(3R)2Epilsonknot

E(4r)=Q/4(pi)(4R)2Epilsonknot


Then I use V=Ed so I integrate this?

What am I integrating though, the difference between the electric fields or the distance?
I am stuck beyond this point and are my electric fields right?
 
I think you need to go back and review how the electric field and potential difference are related (beyond just plucking formulas out of the book) and then reread my previous post.

Your electric fields are not correct. You want the electric field for the regions between the spheres. Also, you can't use V=Ed here.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top