Capacitance of a landing plane in a thunderstorm

  • Thread starter Thread starter sethman737
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Plane
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the capacitance of an airplane's wings acting as a parallel plate capacitor when it acquires a charge of 1 microcoulomb while flying through a thundercloud. To find capacitance, the relevant formula C= |Q/V| is mentioned, but the user struggles with determining the area of the wings and the distance to the ground, which are necessary for calculations. It's suggested to make reasonable assumptions or research specific airplane specifications to obtain these values. Additionally, understanding the potential of the plane and the implications for safety during landing in thunderstorms is emphasized. Proper precautions are necessary to mitigate risks associated with excess charge accumulation.
sethman737
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An airplane flies through a thundercloud and picks up an excess charge of 1 microcoulomb. When the plane comes into land, its wings form approximately a parallel plate capacitor with the ground. What is the capacitance of this system?
What is the potential of the plane?
Why does this matter and what precautions are taken to avoid this?

Homework Equations


C= |Q/V|
V= -Ed (E being determined from Gauss' law)
I would insert the other equations but I'm just learning how to use this system and don't know how to insert the symbols.


The Attempt at a Solution


I am stuck at these equations because I don't know how to find the area of the wings or the distance between the wings and the ground (no dimensions were given for either). Furthermore I don't know if I even need to use these values at all since I may well be using the wrong equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The area of the wings depends on the plane. Make a reasonable assumption or visit the web and look up plane specs. Your equations look correct, but you will also need the equation that gives the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top