Capacitance Problem; somewhat solved, but units are off

  • Thread starter Thread starter clairez93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance Units
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the capacitance of an air-filled spherical capacitor with specified inner and outer shell radii. The capacitance was calculated using the formula C = ab / Ke(b-a), yielding a result of approximately 15.6 pF, which matches the book's answer. For the potential difference resulting in a charge of 4.00 microC, the initial calculation produced an incorrect value, but upon re-evaluation, the correct potential difference of 256 kV was confirmed. The main issue identified was a unit conversion error in the initial calculations. The final results align with the textbook answers after correcting the calculations.
clairez93
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An air-filled spherical capacitor is constructed with inner and outer shell radii of 7.00 and 14.0 cm, respectively. (a) Calculate the capacitance of the device. (b) What potential difference between the spheres results in a charge of 4.00 microC on the capacitor?

Homework Equations



C = ab / Ke(b-a)
C = Q/V

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) C = ab/Ke(b-a) = (.07m * .14m) / (8.9875*10^9N*m^2/C^2 * .07m) = 1.558*10^-11
(b) C = Q/V
V = Q/C = (4*10^-6C) / (1.558*10^-11) = 2.56*10^17

Book's Answers: (a) 15.6 pF (b) 256 kV


I'm pretty sure I messed up somewhere with units and converting, as I'm not sure what units I ended up with, and these answers are much bigger than the book answers. I'm not sure where I went wrong though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer and book's matches for (a). But for (b), there is some calculation error. The working is all right, though.
 
Ah, I see. I put it back into my calculator and came up with the correct answer. 256739 which is equivalent to 256 kV I think.
 
Yep that's right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top