Capacitor Discharge: Deriving the Correct Expression for Potential Difference

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the correct expression for the potential difference across a discharging capacitor connected in series with a resistor. The subject area includes concepts from circuit theory, specifically focusing on capacitors and resistors, and the application of Kirchhoff's voltage law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the expression for the potential difference over the capacitor but expresses confusion regarding the sign in the exponential term as time approaches infinity. Some participants question the direction of current and its effect on the rate of change of voltage across the capacitor.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the implications of current direction on the equations governing capacitor discharge. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definition of current direction and its relationship to voltage change, but multiple interpretations of the current's direction are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is grappling with the mathematical proof of the sign in the exponential decay formula, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the underlying principles of capacitor discharge. There is also mention of varying assumptions about current flow direction in the circuit.

Ahmedbasil
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have a capacitor, of capacitance C farads, with charge Q coulombs. It is connected in series with a resistor of resistance R ohms. Derive an expression for the potential difference over the capacitor at any time t.2. Homework Equations and theorems
[tex]I_{c} = C\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}[/tex]
[tex]V = IR[/tex]

*Kirchhoff's voltage law

The Attempt at a Solution


Using KVL:

[tex]V_{c} - I_{c} R = 0[/tex]
[tex]V_{c} = RC\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{RC} dt = \frac{1}{V_{c}} dV_{c}[/tex]

then:

[tex]V_{c} (t) = V_{initial} e^{\frac{t}{RC}}[/tex]

where

[tex]V_{initial} = \frac{Q}{C}[/tex]

3. My concern

as t approaches infinity the potential difference over the capacitor also approaches infinity. This is definitely not right - the capacitor is discharging. Every textbook/website I look at comes up with the equation:

[tex]V_{c} (t) = V_{initial} e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}[/tex]

For the life of me I cannot figure out what I'm doing wrong. I know what's supposedly wrong with my solution, but I cannot see the mathematical proof of the minus sign on the power of e.

I'd greatly appreciate any help or insight anyone could give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a current direction issue. dV/dt will be negative for the capacitor, right? (It's discharging, so its voltage is dropping). But the current in your circuit you've defined to be positive flowing out of the capacitor. So you should start with Ic = -C dVc/dt.
 
I suppose that dVc/dt doesn't direction into account. Why doesn't it though? At first I considered this, but then I dismissed it, knowing that it's perfectly fine to have a rate of change w.r.t another variable negative. The equation should be:

[tex]I_{c} = C |\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}|[/tex]

Anyway, thanks very much for your help.
 
Last edited:
Ahmedbasil said:
I suppose that dVc/dt doesn't direction into account. Why doesn't it though? At first I considered this, but then I dismissed it, knowing that it's perfectly fine to have a rate of change w.r.t another variable negative. The equation should be:

[tex]|I| = C |\frac{dV_{c}}{dt}|[/tex]

Anyway, thanks very much for your help.

The defining equation for the capacitor does take direction into account. In the definition, the current direction is defined to be INTO the capacitor, and resulting voltage change is positive. Thus, when the voltage change is NEGATIVE, the current will come OUT of the capacitor.
 
Owh, okay, I assumed it is the current OUT of the capacitor. I see :). My bad, and thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K