Capacitor Discharge: Physical Argument in Parallel & Series Connection

AI Thread Summary
In a parallel connection, capacitors discharge similarly to a single larger capacitor because they share the same voltage and electric field, allowing for a combined discharge rate. This results in a faster discharge, as the total capacitance increases with each additional capacitor. Conversely, in a series connection, the capacitors share the same current, but the charge on each capacitor varies due to their individual capacitances, leading to a slower overall discharge. The electric field is also not uniform across the capacitors in series, further impacting the discharge rate. Thus, the key difference in discharge behavior stems from how charge and electric fields are distributed in parallel versus series configurations.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I know that in a parallel connection, two capacitors that are charged and connected across a resistor, the switch is open, the capacitors discharge the same as if there was only one by itself? I need a physical argument as why this is? Any suggestions?

I know that in a series connection, two capacitors that are charged and connected across a resistor, the switch is open, the capacitors discharge slower than if there was only one by itself? I need a physical argument as why this is too? Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what "discharge the same" means exactly, but it doesn't sound correct.

A capacitor is basically just two metal plates separated by a small distance. Two capacitors wired in parallel are equivalent to one larger capacitor with the combined plate area of the two smaller capacitors. If you have two 1 F capacitors, wiring them in parallel results in a 2 F capacitor. A 1 F capacitor can discharge 1 ampere for 1 second per volt of charge. A 2 F capacitor doubles this to 2 amperes for 1 second per volt of charge. That doesn't sound like "the same" to me.

Two capacitors wired in series, however, results in a smaller capacitance. Why? Because by connecting the positive plate of one to the negative plate on the other, you're forcing both plates to have the same potential. (Every point in a conductor has the same potential.) Wiring them in series essentially eliminates half the plate area, and half the capacitance. If you halve the capacitance, you halve the time to discharge.

- Warren
 


In a parallel connection, the two capacitors are essentially connected side by side, with the same voltage applied to each one. This means that the electric field between the plates of each capacitor is the same, and thus the amount of charge stored on each capacitor is also the same. When the switch is opened, the charges on both capacitors will flow through the resistor, resulting in a discharge that is equivalent to one capacitor discharging alone.

On the other hand, in a series connection, the two capacitors are connected in a chain, with the same current flowing through both. This means that the charge on each capacitor is dependent on the capacitance of the individual capacitor and the voltage applied to the entire circuit. As a result, the charge on each capacitor may not be equal and the discharge will be slower compared to a single capacitor. Additionally, the electric field between the plates of each capacitor will also not be the same, further affecting the discharge rate.

In conclusion, the physical argument for the difference in discharge rates in parallel and series connections lies in the distribution of charge and electric field within the capacitors. In parallel, the capacitors have the same charge and electric field, resulting in a faster discharge. In series, the charge and electric field may not be equal, leading to a slower discharge.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top