Capacitor with radius finding the energy density

AI Thread Summary
A capacitor is created from two concentric spherical shells with a potential difference of 100 V applied. To find the energy density at specific points, the correct formulas for a spherical capacitor must be used, as the standard parallel plate capacitor equations are not applicable. The energy density can be calculated using the formula (1/2) ε₀ E², where E is the electric field. The electric field for a spherical capacitor can be determined using the relationship E = V/d, where d is the distance from the center. Accurate calculations require careful application of these principles and proper unit handling.
sonrie
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
A capacitor is formed from two concentric spherical conducting shells separated by vacuum. The inner sphere has radius 12.5 cm , and the outer sphere has radius 16.5 cm . A potential difference of 100 V is applied to the capacitor.



What is the energy density at r = 12.6 cm , just outside the inner sphere?

What is the energy density at r = 16.4 cm , just inside the outer sphere?

Equations:
U= 1/2 CV^2/Ad
U= 1/2 Eo E^2
C= EoA/d
V= Ed

C= 8.85*10^-12 *pi * .126^2/.04 =1.11*10^-11
so next i solved for U, U= .5 *1.11*10^-11 *100^2/pi*.126^2*.04=2.78*10^-5 which is not correct, Help PLease!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sonrie,

I believe you are using a wrong formula here. The expression

<br /> C=\epsilon_0 \frac{A}{d}<br />

applies to a parallel plate capacitor. The spherical capacitor has a different formula.

The formula energy density = (1/2) CV^2/(Ad) is also normally used for the constant field of a parallel plate capacitor. The other one (energy density = (1/2) \epsilon_0 E^2) applies to any capacitor problem.

(You might also find that the formula C=Q/V is helpful.)
 
Thanks!
 
How do I find E, which I need to find the energy density? Then what do I do?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top