Capacitors and potential difference

AI Thread Summary
Capacitors can be charged to higher potential differences than the battery that charges them, as illustrated by camera flash circuits. This is achieved using a DC-DC converter, which allows for voltage boosting. A boost circuit typically involves an inductor, a switch (transistor), a diode, and a capacitor, enabling the transformation of low voltage into high voltage. The complexity and cost of these circuits vary widely based on their application, ranging from inexpensive to highly sophisticated setups. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for applications requiring significant voltage increases.
Fletcher
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
My physics textbook kinda offhandly says capacitors can be charged to higher potential differences than the battery used to charge them and uses a camera flash as an example, however it doesn't say how this is done. What it does say is attaching a capacitor to a batter in a simple circuit will charge the capacitor to the same potential as the battery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fletcher said:
My physics textbook kinda offhandly says capacitors can be charged to higher potential differences than the battery used to charge them and uses a camera flash as an example, however it doesn't say how this is done. What it does say is attaching a capacitor to a batter in a simple circuit will charge the capacitor to the same potential as the battery.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_multiplier
 
A boost circuit that uses an inductor, a switch (transistor), a diode, and the capacitor can boost a couple of volts to a couple of thousand volts or any where in between. I suspect this is what a flash uses. There are lots of example circuits you can look up and their complexity and cost are a function of the application...pennies to thousands of dollars for milli watts(volts) to Megawatts(volts)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top