Capacitors in Series: Find Q on 1.0 μF Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgoeke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors Series
AI Thread Summary
When two capacitors are connected in series, the total capacitance can be calculated using the formula 1/C(equiv) = 1/C1 + 1/C2. To find the charge on the 1.0 μF capacitor connected to a 100 V battery, the equivalent capacitance must first be determined. The charge is then calculated using Q = V * C(equiv), which accounts for the distribution of voltage across each capacitor. The voltage across each capacitor is inversely proportional to its capacitance, leading to different voltages across the capacitors. Using the equivalent capacitance ensures the correct charge is calculated for the series configuration.
sgoeke
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two capacitors with capacitances of 1.0 μC and 0.50 μF, respectively, are connected in series. The system is connected to a 100 V battery. What charge accumulates on the 1.0 μF capacitor?

Homework Equations



For capacitors in series: 1/C(equiv) = 1/C1 + 1/C2

V = Q/C

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the second equation (V=Q/C) to find the charge with V = 100 and C = 1x10^(-6) but I did not get the right answer. However when I found the equivelant capacticance and used that in the second equation to find Q I got the right answer. Can anyone explain whey the second why to do this problem is the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because there are two capacitors in the circuit.
If you use C=C2 (1e-6), then you are just considering a circuit having *one* capacitor.

You basically need to find C to see how the capacitance is split between the two capacitors. That would also give you how the charge is split.
 
sgoeke said:
I used the second equation (V=Q/C) to find the charge with V = 100 and C = 1x10^(-6) but I did not get the right answer. However when I found the equivelant capacticance and used that in the second equation to find Q I got the right answer. Can anyone explain whey the second why to do this problem is the correct way?

With two capacitors in series you will end up with separate voltages across each, summing to the total voltage (100V). FYI, the voltages across capacitors connected in this way go in inverse proportion to their fraction of the total capacitance values. So if C1 and C2 are initially discharged and placed in series, when 100V is applied you end up with

Vc1 = 100V * C2/(C1 + C2)

Vc2 = 100V * C1/(C1 + C2)

Another feature of capacitors in series is that if you try to push a charge in from "one end", it pushes the same amount of charge through to all the capacitors along the line. That's why you obtained the correct answer when you used the equivalent capacitance and the total voltage; each of the capacitors is holding the same charge as the equivalent capacitance.

Ceq = 1/(1/C1 + 1/C2) = C1*C2/(C1 + C2)

Qceq = 100V * Ceq = 100V * C1*C2/(C1 + C2)

Qc1 = 100V * C2/(C1 + C2) * C1

Qc2 = 100V * C1/(C1 + C2) * C2

All the same.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Back
Top