Capacitors in Series: Finding Charge on Each After Reconnection

AI Thread Summary
Three capacitors with capacitances C, 2C, and 3C are connected in series to a voltage U, and after charging, the middle capacitor (2C) is disconnected and reconnected with reversed polarity. The equivalent capacitance of the series connection is calculated as C_a = 6C/11, yielding an initial charge of q_a = 6CU/11 on each capacitor. After the disconnection and reconnection, the voltages across each capacitor are determined, leading to a new charge q_b = 36CU/121 on the capacitors. The final charges on the capacitors are q_1 = q_3 = 102CU/121 and q_2 = -30CU/121, reflecting the effect of the polarity reversal. This analysis demonstrates the changes in charge distribution due to the reconnection of the capacitor.
funoras
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three capacitors, of capacitances C , 2C and 3C respectively are connected in this order in series to a voltage U battery. After they are charged, the middle capacitor (2C) is disconnected and then connected back again with reversed polarity. Find the charges on each of the capacitors after this process.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The equivalent Capacitance
1/C_a = 1/C + 1/2C + 1/3C
C_a = 6C/11
and the charge on every capacitor is
q_a=UC_a=6CU/11

now I'm stuck, i don't know what happens after the disconnection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


funoras said:

Homework Statement


Three capacitors, of capacitances C , 2C and 3C respectively are connected in this order in series to a voltage U battery. After they are charged, the middle capacitor (2C) is disconnected and then connected back again with reversed polarity. Find the charges on each of the capacitors after this process.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The equivalent Capacitance
1/C_a = 1/C + 1/2C + 1/3C
C_a = 6C/11
and the charge on every capacitor is
q_a=UC_a=6CU/11

now I'm stuck, i don't know what happens after the disconnection.

The charge qa that you've found looks good.

Here's an approach that works when you have capacitors that hold an initial charge at the start. From the charge and capacitance you can calculate the potential (voltage) across the capacitor. So for this circuit you can calculate all three potentials. An equivalent circuit model for a charged capacitor is an uncharged capacitor of the same value in series with a fixed voltage supply equal to the initial voltage of the charged capacitor.

Replace all three initially charged capacitors with their equivalent models. To effect the reversal of the 2C capacitor, simply reverse the polarity of its model's voltage supply.

Now, in a series circuit the order of the components does not effect the magnitude or direction of the current (the sum of the terms of the KVL loop equation does not depend upon their order). This means that you can collect all the voltage supplies in the loop together into one supply. You are left with a circuit with a single voltage supply and three uncharged capacitors, and you already know how to find the new charge that will end up on them.

The net charge on each capacitor will be its original charge PLUS this new charge. You'll have to think a bit about how to "add" the new charge to the capacitor that was reversed. Contemplation of the direction in which the current flowed from that capacitor should make it clear.
 


Thank you for the wonderful idea.

So i have calculated each voltage drop
U_1=q_a/C=6U/11
U_2=q_a/2C=3U/11
U_3=q_a/3C=2U/11

now after the reversion, we should have

U-U_3+U_2-U_1=q_b C_a
and from here q_b=36CU/121
q_b is the additional charge you were talking about. Now for each of the capacitor

q_1=q_3=q_a+q_b=102CU/121
and for the reversed one in my opinion
q_2=-\left|q_a-q_b\right|=-30CU/121
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top