Capitalising trigonometric functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the capitalization of trigonometric functions, specifically whether writing Sinθ instead of sinθ is correct or meaningful. Participants explore conventions, potential differences in meaning, and various contexts in which capitalization may be applied.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that capitalizing trigonometric functions is not common practice but does not change the meaning.
  • Others suggest that capitalization might depend on specific conventions, such as restricted sine and cosine functions.
  • A participant recalls that Sin(x) could refer to a different definition of the sine function, though they later express uncertainty about this claim.
  • Another participant mentions that in some texts, Sin(x) is used for the sine function restricted to its principal domain, while Cos(x) is similarly defined.
  • Some participants note that capitalized forms may refer to complex extensions of the sine and cosine functions, indicating variability in usage among authors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of capitalizing trigonometric functions, with multiple competing views and uncertainties remaining in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the definitions and conventions referenced, as well as the lack of supporting evidence for some claims made by participants.

EricPowell
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I have always capitalised the first letter of my trigonometric functions, for example, writing Sinθ as opposed to the usual sinθ. Is it wrong to capitalise them? Does it make a difference in meaning?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It does not, however that is not common practice.
 
It might make a difference, depending on your convention. Restricted sine and cosine functions sometimes have the first letter capitalised. Read: http://www.cliffsnotes.com/study_guide/Inverse-Cosine-and-Inverse-Sine.topicArticleId-11658,articleId-11639.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think I've heard that Sin(x) was used for a different definition of the sine function, like sin(some constant* x).

EDIT: after looking up on the internet, I haven't found anything supporting my claim yet, so I could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Boorglar said:
I think I've heard that Sin(x) was used for a different definition of the sine function, like sin(some constant* x).
In some texts, Sin(x) is the sine function restricted to its principal domain, [-##\pi/2, \pi/2##].

Similarly, Cos(x) is the cosine function restricted to its principal domain, [0, ##\pi##].


Boorglar said:
EDIT: after looking up on the internet, I haven't found anything supporting my claim yet, so I could be wrong.
 
I've seen both Sin and Cos refer to the complex extensions of sin and cos. So it seems as if different authors use the capitalised forms for different variants.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K