Capturing an asteroid in Earth orbit

AI Thread Summary
Capturing a 150-meter asteroid in Earth orbit is feasible, particularly if targeting a Near Earth Object (NEO) rather than a main-belt asteroid. The process would involve applying delta V to adjust the asteroid's orbital velocity, typically through a burn-coast-burn method. A significant challenge lies in preventing the asteroid, likely a rubble pile, from disintegrating during this process, which may necessitate the use of gentler continuous thrust methods, such as advanced ion engines. Additionally, the timing for orbital transfers could require years of planning. Identifying suitable targets is crucial, as not all asteroids are rubble piles; some may be solid metal chunks.
bhn1700
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Yes I know someone else has posted something similar but I was wondering if capturing an 150 meter asteroid is possible in Earth orbit? Also can it be done by adjusting the delta v way out from Earth using the tug of a probe that you send to do such a job? (And maybe a final slow down with the moon when you get close.) And lastly can a 150 meter asteroid be captured into Earth orbit without it being torn apart given the 'rubble pile' nature that it will very likely have?
Thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Big question. I'm guessing you're looking for a Space Elevator counterweight?

First off, you're almost certainly looking at a NEO (Near Earth Object), not a main-belt asteroid. Apollo, Aten and Amor asteroids are all good candidates.

Secondly, you would *apply* delta v in order to *adjust* the orbital velocity. Orbital transfers are typically done by applying propulsive force to initiate the transfer orbit, and then you coast until you reach the altitude of the orbit you're transferring to, at which point you apply delta V again in order to complete the velocity adjustment.

For an NEO, the delta V is quite modest. Of course, a 150 m object is very massive, so the *total* impulse is pretty darn huge. This is why a main belt rock seems to be out of the question, but an NEO would be possible. A major difficulty is that for a particular object, you might have to wait many years for the orbital timing to be right.

A typical burn-coast-burn transfer would need to find a way to apply that force without tearing the rubble pile apart. In my mind this would likely be the most challenging part of the enterprise. (Not counting the politics of getting approval to do such a thing.)

So maybe you would use the gentler continuous thrust method, most likely meaning that you would use ion engines (of a future design with more thrust than current engines). This would make it a lot easier to apply the force non-destructively.

I'm thinking the gravity gradient in a high Earth orbit is so small that tearing the rubble pile apart would not be an issue, but I've never played with the numbers on that, so I dunno.

All indications are that the stuff up there is a very diverse population in terms of these parameters. The first trick is to identify your target, note that not all of them are going to be rubble piles and you might find one that is a solid chunk of metal.

Hey I know - we should go take a look with a prospector craft.

HTH
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top