Cart with Pendulum | Tension expression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the tension expression in a massless bar attached to a cart moving in the x-direction, with the bar pivoting at the cart. The initial expression for tension, T - mg*cos(θ) = m * (θ (dot))² * L, is questioned regarding its completeness. Participants emphasize that the cart's acceleration must be considered, as it contributes a radial component that affects the overall tension. It is noted that the centripetal acceleration cannot be accurately determined by simply summing the radial force components without accounting for the cart's acceleration. The conversation highlights the complexity of the dynamics involved in the system.
AAO
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
I am trying to derive an expression for the Tension T in the massless bar in the given photo. Where there is a cart that is moving only in the x-direction and the bar is rotating around a point pivoted at the cart with angle theta. The expression that I have is deduced from:

∑ F (towards center) = Centripetal Acceleration

Which gives:

T - mg*cos(θ) = m * (θ (dot))2 *L

Is this true? or I should add another force term that comes from the cart acceleration it self:
M*x(double dot) * sin(θ)?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    9 KB · Views: 551
Physics news on Phys.org
AAO said:
∑ F (towards center) = Centripetal Acceleration
You have not stated the whole problem. From the diagram, it looks as though the cart is accelerating, or at least, free to accelerate in response to the tension.
If you think of the bob's acceleration as that plus acceleration relative to the cart, the latter is the centripetal acceleration, yes? But the acceleration of the cart has a component in the radial direction, so it would not be true that the centripetal acceleration can be found by summing the radial components of the forces.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top