Cartesian Co-ordinates and Polar Co-ordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
Just to make sure I got this right.

Cartesian is the popular x,y,z.

Polar is the one with degrees, and has a circular shape.

Is that it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Another question I kind of forgot about in High School. :(

When they say nEW, nEN, or xERe?

I know some mean rational, real, or what not.

Can anyone help?
 
The only problem with your first post is that "x,y,z" is three dimensional and polar coordinates are two dimensional.

In two dimensions, the point (x,y) in Cartesian coordinates is (r,θ) in polar coordinates. r is the straight line distance from (0,0) to (x,y) and θ is the angle the line from (0,0) to (x,y) makes with the positive x-axis.
x= r cos(θ) and y= r sin(&theta).
r= √(x2+ y2) and θ= arctan(y/x).

In three dimensions, one can use either "cylindrical coordinates" or "spherical coordinates" as an analog to polar coordinates.
 
Thanks, that helps now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top