Cartesian to spherical polar coordinates

birdhen
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I am getting confused about how to work this out.
I know that to convert cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates you can use:
theta=arccos(z)
phi=arcsin(y/sin(theta))

my problem is that I have a list of coordinates, let's call them THETA and PHI. I change them into X,Y,Z and then rotate them by 2 Euler angles.
THETA is in the range(0->2pi)
PHI is in the range (-pi/2->pi/2).

the problem is once I have completed the transforms I want the new value theta, As it is found using arccos the value returned is only in the range 0->pi, the values come back between 0 and 180, where as the THETA values are between 0 and 360, and therefore I want my transformed values to be in the range 0 to 360. I think I need to use quadrants but I have been searching the internet and can't find the info I need.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi birdhen! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a phi: φ and a pi: π and a degree: º :wink:)
birdhen said:
theta=arccos(z)
phi=arcsin(y/sin(theta))

my problem is that I have a list of coordinates, let's call them THETA and PHI. I change them into X,Y,Z and then rotate them by 2 Euler angles.
THETA is in the range(0->2pi)
PHI is in the range (-pi/2->pi/2).

I normally do it the other way round …

θ from -π/2 to π/2, and φ from 0 to 2π …

then you have x = rsinθcosφ, y = rsinθsinφ, so you can use x as well as y to work out what φ is. :smile:
 
ah, thank you,
so y/x=tanφ,
and the value of φ will depend on whether x and y are negative or positve.

Wonderful, that was the hint I needed,

Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top