Cascode Amplifier Small Signal Model

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the small-signal model for a cascode MOSFET amplifier circuit. The user is confused about the placement of the output voltage and whether it should be referenced to ground or another transistor. They inquire about calculating the voltage gain Vo/Vi and express uncertainty regarding the current flow through the output resistor ro2. Clarifications are provided that current does not need to leave a loop to complete it, and KVL, KCL, and Ohm's laws still apply without a ground reference. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding current paths and node analysis in circuit design.
CoolDude420
Messages
199
Reaction score
9

Homework Statement


Hi,

I'm just trying to derive the small-signal model of the cascode MOSFET amplifier circuit. In the lectures, we were just given the small-signal model directly. I'm trying to derive it.

I have almost the exact same thing except where I put the output voltage. In the lectures, it is put between D2 and S1,G2. However when I was deriving it, I put it between Ro2.

My derivation attempt:
1d7ebfcffd.png

449b8eaf00.png

4e8d28f0ba.png

cff54f746a.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • 1d7ebfcffd.png
    1d7ebfcffd.png
    48.2 KB · Views: 1,830
  • 449b8eaf00.png
    449b8eaf00.png
    60.8 KB · Views: 1,231
  • 4e8d28f0ba.png
    4e8d28f0ba.png
    51.3 KB · Views: 1,282
  • cff54f746a.png
    cff54f746a.png
    46.9 KB · Views: 1,290
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't Vo supposed to be in reference to ground, not the other transistor?
 
scottdave said:
Isn't Vo supposed to be in reference to ground, not the other transistor?
Ah yes! Thank you.

One more question, how would I go about finding the voltage gain Vo/Vi? I have no idea where to start with it because Vo is at such an awkward position.(between D2 and gnd)

I'm assuming its a KVL loop involving ro1 ro2 and vo?
 
Last edited:
2 loops should do it.
 
scottdave said:
2 loops should do it.

In the lecture notes we have,
it says that

$$V_{ro2} + V_o + V_{gs2} = 0$$
$$ V_{ro2} = (g_m)(v_{gs2})(r_{o2}) $$

How can you assume that all of the $$(g_m)(v_{gs2})$$ current flows through ro2??
 
CoolDude420 said:
How can you assume that all of the
(gm)(vgs2)​
(g_m)(v_{gs2}) current flows through ro2??

Where else is it going to go?
 
donpacino said:
Where else is it going to go?
through r01?
 
CoolDude420 said:
through r01?
how would it do that, current has to flow in a loop
 
donpacino said:
how would it do that, current has to flow in a loop
Ah yes. Just another question. If the gmvgs2 current only goes through ro2, and since there is no ground in that loop. Where does the current leave? I'm used to most circuits with a ground. I'm assuming it just disspitates through the resistor as heat?
 
  • #10
CoolDude420 said:
If the gmvgs2 current only goes through ro2, and since there is no ground in that loop.

You don't need to have ground in a current loop.

your kvl, kcl, and ohms laws still apply here. The current doesn't need to "leave" it just needs to 'complete its loop'
 
  • #11
I'm not where I can draw a picture, right now. In the loop which has r02: look at Node D2. The current entering and leaving that node must be equal, so the current through r02 must equal the source current.
 
  • #12
donpacino said:
You don't need to have ground in a current loop.

your kvl, kcl, and ohms laws still apply here. The current doesn't need to "leave" it just needs to 'complete its loop'

Ah perfect. I get it now. Thank you!
 
  • #13
scottdave said:
I'm not where I can draw a picture, right now. In the loop which has r02: look at Node D2. The current entering and leaving that node must be equal, so the current through r02 must equal the source current.

That makes perfect sense. Thank you.
 
  • #14
scottdave said:
I'm not where I can draw a picture, right now. In the loop which has r02: look at Node D2. The current entering and leaving that node must be equal, so the current through r02 must equal the source current.

I just had a second thought. Doesn't that sort of disagree if we apply KCL at the other node(S2, D1)?

I apply KCL at the the middle node on the right side(S2, D1).
KCL at S2, D1 $$ g_mv_{gs,2} + i_{r_{o1}}= i_{r_{o2}} + g_mv_{gs,1}$$
Rearranging,
$$ g_mv_{gs,2} = i_{r_{o2}} + g_mv_{gs,1} - i_{r_{o1}}$$

That is telling me that in fact, not all of the current is going through r_o2.

What am I missing?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top