Casimir Trick in \( e^+ e^- \to H \to f \bar{f} \)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dingo_d
  • Start date Start date
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Casimir trick in e+e-->H->ffbar

Homework Statement


I have the process:

e^+e^-\to H\to f\bar{f}

I have calculated the amplitude and it's conjugate, and now I want to find the averaged, unpolarized square of the invariant amplitude \langle|M|^2\rangle.

I average over the initial spins and sum over the final and usually in some simple processes like Moller scattering, I would play with Casimir trick and traces. But here I have:

\langle|M|^2\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{g_w^2}{4m_w^2} m_e m_f\right)^2\sum_{spins} \bar{u}_4v_2\bar{v}_1u_3\bar{v}_2u_4\bar{u}_3v_1

Where \bar{v}_1 is the incoming positron with impulse p_1 and spin s_1, u_3 is the incoming electron, v_2 is the outgoing anti fermion, and \bar{u}_4 is the outgoing fermion.

If I look at the spinor components, I can arrange them into pairs and use the relations:

\sum_{s_1}u_{1\delta}\bar{u}_{1\alpha}=({\not} p_1+m_1)_{\delta\alpha} and \sum_{s_2}v_{2\beta}\bar{v}_{2\gamma}=({\not} p_2-m_2)_{\beta\gamma}

But I'm not getting any trace out of this :\

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Homework Equations \langle|M|^2\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{g_w^2}{4m_w^2} m_e m_f\right)^2\sum_{spins} \bar{u}_4v_2\bar{v}_1u_3\bar{v}_2u_4\bar{u}_3v_1\sum_{s_1}u_{1\delta}\bar{u}_{1\alpha}=({\not} p_1+m_1)_{\delta\alpha} and \sum_{s_2}v_{2\beta}\bar{v}_{2\gamma}=({\not} p_2-m_2)_{\beta\gamma}The Attempt at a Solution To solve this problem, you need to use the Casimir trick. This is an algebraic trick which allows you to calculate the unpolarized, averaged square of the amplitude by summing over the initial spins and then taking the trace of the matrix. First, you need to express the spinors in terms of the momentum 4-vectors and the mass of the particle. Then, you can rearrange the spinors so that you have pairs of spinors which can be summed over using the Casimir trick. For example, you can rearrange the spinors so that you have: \langle|M|^2\rangle=\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{g_w^2}{4m_w^2} m_e m_f\right)^2\sum_{spins} Tr[\bar{v}_1({\not} p_1+m_1)v_2\bar{u}_3({\not} p_2-m_2)u_4] Now, you can take the trace of the matrix to get: \langle|M|^2\rangle=\frac{1}{2
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top