Catia: Giant Among Mech Eng Softwares

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxx_payne
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Catia is often regarded as a top-tier software in mechanical engineering, but its efficiency compared to others like SolidWorks, Solid Edge, and Inventor largely depends on the specific design tasks. SolidWorks is noted for being more affordable and efficient for general applications, while the other software options perform similarly for most tasks. The choice of software should align with the specific needs of the project, especially for specialized designs. Many mechanical engineers prefer SolidWorks, followed by Inventor, Pro E, and Solid Edge. Ultimately, the best software choice is contingent on individual project requirements and personal preference.
maxx_payne
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
DEAR MECH ENGINEERS
CAN I ASK YOU
whats the rank of catia between other softwares
such as solid works and solid edge and pro eng and inventor
and if its possible tell me
is catia the most effieicnt between them and is it enough for any mechanical engineer or its like other software has somethin missing ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think many or most will say Catia is the best. But will you need it and will it be the most efficient? Totally depends on what you do. Ar you designing cars or are you designing brackets?

Solidworks is cheaper an more 'efficient' probably in that realm.

And as far as Solidworks vs inventor vs Solid Edge... they all do 95% the same thing so don't even worry about it. Just buy the one that makes sense to you.

If you do something really specialized and one of those programs has a special package to deal with that, then buy that program. Otherwise, don't stress it.

Most mech engineers I know use Solidworks then Inventor then Pro E then Solid Edge in that order.

I like to use inventor.
 
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top