Why Are These Functions Time Variant and Non-Causal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The functions g(t) = f(t) + f(-t) and g(t) = f(t/2) are both classified as time variant and non-causal. They are time variant because their outputs change with the time variable "t." The first function is non-causal due to its dependence on f(-t), which implies values before time zero, while the second function is non-causal because it relies on future values of the input by dividing time by 2. Both functions violate the principle of causality, as their outputs can change based on future events. Thus, they exemplify the characteristics of time variant and non-causal functions.
skan
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1.g(t) = f(t) + f(-t)
2. g(t)= f(t/2)
can someone pls explain why these functions are time variant and non causal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are my guesses:

They're time variant because they vary with the time variable "t".

The first one is non-causal because because it uses -t (negative time), so the function could have a value before time 0, usually the definition of when an initial event happens. The output could change before the stimulating event.

The second one is non causal because the division of time by 2. This means that the output could change at t=1 second, caused by an event at 2 seconds. This would be non-causal because the output would occur before the stimulating event.

The basic definition of causal is that the output cannot change before an initial event, and all event functions, (closing of a switch, pushing a button..) are defined for t => 0.
 


Both of these functions are considered time variant and non-causal because they both depend on the variable "t," which represents time. A time variant function means that the output of the function changes with respect to time, while a non-causal function means that the output depends on future values of the input, which violates the principle of causality.

In the first function, g(t) is equal to the sum of two functions, f(t) and f(-t). This means that the output of g(t) depends on both the current time (t) and the past time (-t). This makes it time variant because the output changes based on the value of t. Additionally, it is non-causal because it depends on both past and future values of the input, which violates the principle of causality.

In the second function, g(t) is equal to f(t/2). This means that the output of g(t) is dependent on the value of t/2, which changes as time passes. Therefore, the output of g(t) is also changing with respect to time, making it time variant. It is also non-causal because it depends on future values of the input (since t/2 will have a different value in the future), which again, violates the principle of causality.

In summary, both of these functions are time variant because their output changes with respect to time, and they are non-causal because they violate the principle of causality by depending on future values of the input.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top