Cause of water pressure in pipework

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the causes of water pressure in domestic heating system pipework, exploring the roles of pipe deformation, water incompressibility, and different system types such as sealed and vented systems. It also touches on hydraulic strength testing of pipes and the methods used in such tests.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that water pressure in heating systems is primarily due to the deformation of pipes rather than the compression of water, citing water's incompressibility.
  • Another participant counters that sealed systems use an expansion vessel to maintain pressure, while vented systems rely on a header tank, which provides pressure through elevation.
  • A later reply discusses hydraulic strength testing of pipes, questioning whether pressure is maintained by the pipes pushing back on the water in the absence of expansion vessels.
  • Some participants agree that during hydraulic testing, the pressure is indeed maintained by the pipes, while also noting that water is slightly compressed.
  • There is mention of the use of compressed air or nitrogen for leak testing, with some uncertainty about the standard practices for water-only tests.
  • One participant emphasizes the advantages of using incompressible fluids for proof testing, suggesting it minimizes stored energy and makes failures less dramatic.
  • Another participant expresses concerns about the challenges of achieving and maintaining pressure during water tests, indicating that results may be less clear.
  • Different methods for testing drains and underfloor heating systems are mentioned, highlighting variability in testing approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the primary causes of water pressure in pipework, with some supporting the role of pipe deformation and others emphasizing the importance of system design (sealed vs. vented). The discussion includes multiple competing perspectives on hydraulic testing methods and their implications.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the standard practices for hydraulic testing, particularly concerning the application of pressure and the implications of using different fluids for testing.

Jehannum
Messages
102
Reaction score
26
Am I correct in saying that water pressure (in typical domestic heating system pipework) is achieved by deformation of the pipes rather than compression of the water? I believe water to be virtually incompressible, so the 3 bar (or whatever) pressure must come from the elastic stretching of the pipework.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, or perhaps I should say neither.

There are two main types of wet heating systems in the world. Sealed and vented.

Sealed systems typically have an expansion vessel (a rubber bladder in a metal tank) that maintains the pressure. The bladder is pumped up with air much like a car tyre. This also provides somewhere for the water to expand into. Without the expansion vessel small changes in water volume would cause large changes in pressure. There is almost always a Pressure Relief Valve fitted as well just in case the expansion vessel fails or the water is heated to boiling point. Typically the bladder is pumped upto 1-1.5 bar, it then increases to 2-3 bar when the system is filled with water from the mains (at 3-6 bar).

In vented systems (still common in the UK) there is a header tank mounted high up that provides the pressure and allows for expansion. The header tank is open to the atmosphere hence the name vented. Typical heights are perhaps 6 or 7 meters so the pressure is only about 0.6-0.7bar.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, Asymptotic, russ_watters and 2 others
Thanks for the information.

What about the case of hydraulic strength testing of pipes, where several bar of pressure can be used to test pipework (and there are no expansion vessels and the like)? Is the pressure maintained by the pipes pushing back on the water in this case?
 
Yes.

Consider the forces on a small section of the pipe...

Pipe.jpg


This bit of the pipe isn't accelerating so Newtons law F=ma says the net force (F) in all directions must be zero. The outward radial force due to the pressure of the water is countered by tension in the copper. Copper isn't particularly elastic so not much deformation will occur to the copper pipe unless the pressure is very high. Obviously if the pressure is high enough to break the pipe the tension force will disappear and some of the pipe might "accelerate" :-)

Even though water isn't very compressible it is being compressed very slightly. If you consider a small region of water near the pipe the forces on that must also sum to zero. The radial force from the rest of the water is balanced by the force of the pipe. So you can't really say that the pressure is "caused" by one or the other, it's both.

water.jpg
Now I think about it this must also be true for a system with an expansion vessel. In such a system the expansion vessel is what regulates the pressure when the water heats up or cools down but the forces will still be balanced as described above.
 

Attachments

  • Pipe.jpg
    Pipe.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 599
  • water.jpg
    water.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 584
Jehannum said:
Thanks for the information.

What about the case of hydraulic strength testing of pipes, where several bar of pressure can be used to test pipework (and there are no expansion vessels and the like)? Is the pressure maintained by the pipes pushing back on the water in this case?
If it is a water-only test, yes, but I'm not sure that is a standard practice. Leak testing is often done with compressed air/nitrogen so you can detect leaks with a drop in pressure over time. I'm not even sure how to accomplish that with a system full of water.
 
Actually, that's a very standard way to 'proof test.' The beauty is that the incompressibility of the fluid minimizes the stored energy - it makes failures much less spectacular.
 
Dullard said:
Actually, that's a very standard way to 'proof test.' The beauty is that the incompressibility of the fluid minimizes the stored energy - it makes failures much less spectacular.
Yes, but it also makes achieving and maintaining pressure harder, so the test results may be less clear. Googling I see that it is done, but I'm having trouble finding an explanation of exactly how the pressure is applied.
 
Depends if you are testing for leaks or safety. Our drains were tested using air pumped in by a hand squeezed rubber bulb. Our underfloor heating was tested using water pumped in using a thing that looked like a bottle jack.

Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K