Understanding the Mathematics Behind the Center of Gravity Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the mathematics behind the center of gravity problem involving a belt hanger balanced on a table. The center of mass is described as an average position of mass, and its mathematical representation is provided. A free body diagram is suggested to clarify the forces acting on the system, including the upward force from the table and the gravitational force on the wooden piece. It is emphasized that balancing an object at its center of mass results in no torque, preventing rotation. The mathematical expression for torque is discussed, concluding that when the center of mass is at the fulcrum, the torque equals zero.
unctarheels1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the math for this problem. My instructor did a poor job of explaining it in class.

He took a "skyhook" or belt hanger ( looks like a music note make out of wood)" put a stiff belt on it and balanced it on the edge of a table. He exaplained that the center of gravity of the belt (which was at an angle and leaning under the table) was directly under the base of the belt hanger and that made it balance.

There has to be a mathematical answer to this. Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The center of mass is a kind of average position of the mass. In many cases, it is useful to consider the body to be concentrated at the center of mass. Mathematically, the position of the center of mass is

\frac{\sum{m_{i}}{r_{i}}}{M}

m_{i} is the mass of the ith particle and r_{i} is its corresponding position.
 
here is a link to a picture of the problem I am describing.

http://www.uvm.edu/~dahammon/demonstrations/balancingbelt.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
here is a link to a picture of the problem I am describing.

http://www.uvm.edu/~dahammon/demonstrations/balancingbelt.html


If I could get a correct Free body diagram for it, I think I would understand it.

- You should have a force acting upward from the table to the tip of the "belt hanger" and then the belt puts a force on the hanger as well. I suppose it would act at the angle the belt is hanging. Am I missing anything else other than the gravity, which would act on the entire wooden piece?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When you balance something at its center of mass or directly under or over its center of mass, there is no torque. Thats why it doesn't turn. As for the mathematics of it, let's see what information we can get from the situation. We need an expression for the torque. Let's take the horizontal axis as the x axis. the torque would be

\tau = \sum{m_{i}}g{x_{i}} = g\sum{m_{i}}{x_{i}}

Where the x_{i}s are the distances from the fulcrum.
But \sum{m_{i}}{x_{i}} is the total mass M times the position of the center of mass. Since in our case, the position of the center of mass is 0, i.e it is at a distance x = 0 from the fulcrum, the torque must be zero.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top